Can Indonesia Secure a Development Dividend from Its Resource Export Boom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8416699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rashesh Shrestha (0000-0001-9142-5001, Association of Southeast Asian Nations), Ian Coxhead (0000-0001-6958-038X, University of Wisconsin–Madison) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4918 • E-ISSN: 1472-7234 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00074918.2018.1458702 |
| OpenAlex | W2885212336 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 17 |
Indonesia has enjoyed a long spell of sustained and relatively rapid economic expansion, largely on the back of strong commodity prices. No commodity boom lasts forever, however, and threats to the continuation of this growth are mounting. Indonesia now faces the challenge of locking in gains and setting a course to sustain future development in less favourable times. Post-2000 growth differs from earlier experience in that exports of agricultural products, especially palm oil, have played a leading role. In contrast to the country's earlier oil and gas export boom, the gains from agricultural export growth have accrued mainly to private actors, including corporations, smallholders, and the agricultural labour force, with a much smaller share passing through government budgets. The government can no longer simply mandate the use of funds for development purposes; many other actors and institutions are involved. It is reasonable to suppose that the benefits from such a decentralised export boom would be widely diffused, with relatively large effects on rural and farm households and lower-skilled workers. However, this boom has been accompanied by a sharp rise in inequality and virtually no real wage growth. Moreover, while spending rose robustly during the boom, it is not clear that poor, farm-based households have chosen (or been able) to use gains to smooth consumption or to invest for future generations. The capacity to lock in gains at micro and macro levels is subject to significant policy influence. In line with the maxim that ‘the time to repair a roof is when the sun is shining’, currently healthy global economic conditions present an opportune moment for Indonesian policymakers to take stock and to look ahead, with an eye to optimal development policy settings
Agriculture · Boom · Business · Commodity · Consumption (sociology) · Economic policy · Economics · Government (linguistics) · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Mandate · Market economy · Oil boom · International Development and Aid · Mining and Resource Management · Natural Resources and Economic Development
Trade shocks in developing countries
Contract Farming and Vulnerability to Poverty among Oil Palm Smallholders in Indonesia
The Indonesian Economy
Macroeconomic Policies, Crises, and Long-Term Growth in Indonesia, 1965-90
Natural Resources Management
A New Resource Curse? Impacts of China’s Boom on Comparative Advantage and Resource Dependence in Southeast Asia
The big push, natural resource booms and growth
Growth, Poverty, and Inequality under Jokowi
Labour-Market Developments at a Time of Heightened Uncertainty
Twenty Years of Expenditure Inequality in Indonesia, 1993–2013
Indonesia's Resources Boom in International Perspective
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |