Revisiting the mature economy
Britain, 1860–1939
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8418804 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tim Rooth (University of Finance and Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-126 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Business History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-6791 • E-ISSN: 1743-7938 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00076790500204909 |
| OpenAlex | W2085736944 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 Although in the case of the self-governing dominions this view has been challenged by Thompson and Magee, “A Soft Touch?,” 689–717. 2 And could even generate higher labour productivity in the case of the cotton spinning industry. Leunig, “A British Industrial Success,” 90–117. 3 Habakkuk, American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. 4 Harley, “Trade: Discovery, Mercantilism and Technology”, 191–5, 198–200. 5 Foreman-Peck, History of the World Economy, 121. 6 McCloskey and Sandberg, “From Damnation to Redemption,” 89–108. 7 Knight, “The Ethics of Competition,” 598, cited by Nicholas. 8 Feinstein, “What Really Happened to Real Wages?,” 329–55
Art · Competition (biology · Damnation · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Knight · Literature · Market economy · Mercantilism · Peck (Imperial · Productivity · Australian History and Society · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Political and Economic history of UK and US
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |