Visual convincing of intangible cultural relationships using maps
A case study of the Tongariro National Park World Heritage nomination dossier
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8422682 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mark H Palmer (University of Missouri, autor correspondente), Anna Feyerherm (University of Missouri) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 81-92 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0008-3658 • E-ISSN: 1541-0064 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cag.12439 |
| OpenAlex | W2791532714 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
UNESCO World Heritage site nominations require the use and presence of maps and GIS to demarcate potential heritage property boundaries. UNESCO and the World Heritage Committee provided specific cartographic guidelines and standards for the inclusion of maps within the nominations. The New Zealand government used maps and GIS to visually convince UNESCO, the World Heritage Committee, the International Union on the Conservation of Nature, and the International Council on Monuments and Sites of intangible cultural relationships at Tongariro National Park. More specifically, New Zealand combined scientific maps, Māori language narratives, and symbols to make the intangible tangible and geographically visible. Maps and GIS images that accompanied World Heritage nomination dossiers were housed at the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and the International Council on Monuments and Sites in Paris, France. The first section of the paper introduces the data sources and methods used in our archival research. Next, we provide a brief description of the Tongariro National Park nomination and present a case study on, and interpretation of, the maps and GIS contained within the Tongariro National Park World Heritage nomination dossier. Finally, we will offer some conclusions and directions for future research
Archaeology · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Cultural property · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Industrial heritage · Intangible cultural heritage · National park · Nomination · Political science · Tourism · World heritage · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Law
How to Lie with Maps
The Origins of IndigenismHuman Rights and the Politics of Identity
The Origins of Indigenism
In Defense of Being “Native”
Indigeneity and Homeland
Cartographic Encounters at the Bureau of Indian Affairs Geographic Information System Center of Calculation
Mapping Indigenous Depth of Place
Mapping, Postmodernism, Indigenous People And The Changing Direction Of North American Cartography
Theorizing Indigital Geographic Information Networks
Sustaining indigenous geographies through world heritage
Cartographic Encounters
Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers
Mapping Them ‘Out’
A Map that Roared and an Original Atlas
The Treaty at Waitangi
Hybrid Geographies
Whose Woods Are These? Counter-Mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia
The breath of the mountain is my heart
Unesco and the Fate of the World Heritage Indigenous Peoples Council of Experts (WHIPCOE)
Cartographic Encounters
Maps and Memes
Mapping Indigenous Lands
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2021 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |