Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring motivation crowding around farmer incentives for riparian management in Nova Scotia

Bibliographic Data

ID8423979
AuthorsKate Sherren (0000-0003-1576-9878, Dalhousie University, corresponding author), Wesley Tourangeau (0000-0001-5447-4656, Dalhousie University), Mhari Lamarque (Dalhousie University), Simon Greenland‐Smith (Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture)
Year2020
Volume64
Issue2
Pages250-265
Publication date2020-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-3658 • E-ISSN: 1541-0064
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cag.12572
OpenAlexW2981907534
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited48

Incentive programs to encourage landowners to protect habitat should be carefully designed to avoid motivation crowding: basically, replacing intrinsic reasons such as a land ethic with extrinsic ones like payments. Little research on motivation crowding tests real programs, and no such work has been done in Canada. We surveyed farmers in Nova Scotia in 2017 to explore whether participation in a new incentive program called Wood Turtle Strides, or knowledge about a similar incentive program potentially available in the future, would alter reported motivations to use riparian setbacks and buffers. Motivations to use setbacks or buffers were heavily intrinsic across all four survey cohorts: wildlife stewardship and sacrifice motivated actions more than social pressures. We were not able to statistically test for motivational crowding due to low program uptake and thus post‐program survey responses, but there was no evidence of second‐hand crowding: farmers being motivated by hearing about a program in an adjacent jurisdiction. Findings point to the significance of wildlife stewardship for many farmers, and persistent resistance to conservation among others, as well as a risk of low additionality. More post‐program research is necessary to fully understand the program's net impact on motivations and conservation

Additionality · Business · Crowding · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Habitat · Incentive · Incentive program · Natural resource economics · Nova scotia · Political science · Prosocial behavior · Public economics · Riparian zone · Stewardship (theology) · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Ecology · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Social Psychology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

  • Beyond intrinsic

    Wesley Tourangeau, Mhari Lamarque et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2020

  • Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales

    Gail M Sullivan, Anthony R Artino•Journal of Graduate Medical…•2013

  • Motivation Crowding Theory

    Open Access•Bruno S Frey, Reto Jegen•Journal of Economic Surveys•2001

  • Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates

    Open Access•Stephen R Kellert•Conservation Biology•1993

  • Will Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection

    Hayley H Chouinard, T Paterson et al.•Land Economics•2008

  • Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

    Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•American Psychologist•2000

  • Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy

    Open Access•Julian Rode, Erik Gomez‐baggethun et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture

    Open Access•Wei Zhang, Taylor H Ricketts et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

  • When the Implementation of Payments for Biodiversity Conservation Leads to Motivation Crowding-out

    Open Access•Colas Chervier, Gwenolé Le Velly et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services

    Open Access•J M Kerr, Mamta Vardhan et al.•International Journal of the…•2014

  • Supply of an ecosystem service—Farmers’ willingness to adopt riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments

    Open Access•Cathal Buckley, Samuel Hyne et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2012

  • Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding

    Open Access•Driss Ezzine‐de‐bla, Esteve Corbera et al.•Ecological Economics•2018

  • The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys

    Richard C Stedman, Nancy A Connelly et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  • Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action

    Roldan Muradian•Society & Natural Resources•2013

  • Wonder, ignorance, and resistance

    Open Access•Andrea Olive, Jenny L Mccune•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments

    Open Access•Romy Greiner, Dorothy Gregg et al.•Land Use Policy•2011

  • Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights

    Open Access•Stewart Lockie•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Spillovers from targeting of incentives

    Open Access•Francisco Alpizar, Anna Nordén et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2017

  • Exploring rural landowners’ willingness to protect species at risk in Prince Edward Island

    Open Access•H Carolyn P Brown•Canadian Geographies /…•2019

  • Farm management fragmentation in Nova Scotia does not affect farm habitat provision

    Open Access•Kate Sherren, Simon Greenland‐Smith•Canadian Geographies /…•2019

  • What Can and Can't Crowding Theories Tell Us about Farmers' 'Environmental' Intentions in Post-Agri-Environment Scheme Contexts

    Open Access•Helena S Darragh, Steven B Emery•Sociologia Ruralis•2018

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae