Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An integrated framework for conceptualizing and measuring gender dysphoria

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Gender Dysphoria Measure

Bibliographic Data

ID8707948
AuthorsM Paz Galupo (0000-0002-7991-9970, corresponding author), Louis Lindley (0000-0003-1080-0813), Zakary A Clements (0000-0001-7146-2761)
Year2025
Volume81
Issue2
Pages199-220
Publication date2025-10-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/amp0001604
PMID41100265
OpenAlexW4415247052
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The current article presents an integrated community-informed framework from which to conceptualize the complexity of gender dysphoria and the social context in which it is navigated. Our multidimensional model of gender dysphoria uses a systems-based approach to consider aspects of gender dysphoria that are experienced across individual, interpersonal, structural, and cultural levels. It is from this broad framework that we developed and conducted a psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Gender Dysphoria Measure (MGDM). Measure items were developed around five hypothesized subscales with input from content experts and refined through cognitive interviews. The initial 83 items were administered to 599 transgender and nonbinary participants (53.76% people of color) who endorsed diverse gender identities (i.e., 41.1% nonbinary, 24.5% women, and 34.4% men). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure that was upheld during confirmatory factor analysis, representing (a) body gender dysphoria, (b) social gender dysphoria, (c) variability of gender dysphoria, (d) gender dysphoria relief, and (e) internalized gender normativity. The final 25-item scale was found to be invariant across gender, race, and assigned sex, allowing the MGDM to be used to make meaningful within-group comparisons that are not confounded by measurement error. Overall, the MGDM evidenced partial convergent, discriminant, and incremental predictive validity. The MGDM allows for a multidimensional conceptualization of gender dysphoria that is inclusive of both body and social components. Conceptually grounded in both gender normativity and gender minority stress theory, the MGDM can guide further research in these important areas of transgender and nonbinary health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Conceptualization · Confirmatory factor analysis · Context (archaeology · Dysphoria · Exploratory factor analysis · Gender dysphoria · Gender role · Operationalization · Psychometrics · Transgender · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Sex and Gender in Healthcare

  • Centering transgender and gender nonconforming people of color in the study of minority stress, transition-related factors, and mental health

    Open Access•Michelle R Dalton, Scott Secrest et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • From Avoidance to Engagement

    Louis Lindley, Annalisa Anzani et al.•International Journal of Sexual…•2026

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae