Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I forgot that you existed

Role of memory accessibility in the gender citation gap

Bibliographic Data

ID8711727
AuthorsVeronica X Yan (0000-0002-3988-3184, corresponding author), Amy Arndt, Amy N Arndt, Katherine Muenks (0000-0003-2075-083X), Marlone D Henderson (0000-0002-7861-6003)
Year2024
Volume80
Issue1
Pages91-105
Publication date2024-01-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/amp0001299
PMID38271029
OpenAlexW4391230774
LanguageEN
Citations received3

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in American Psychologist on Sep 19 2024 (see record 2025-24490-001). The name of the author, Amy N. Arndt was incorrectly omitted from the author list in the original article. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Recent studies have found a citation gap in psychology favoring men. This citation gap is subsequently reflected in differences in h-index scores, a crude measure but important one for impact on career advancement. We examine a potential reason for the gap: that male researchers are more likely to come to mind than female researchers (i.e., a difference in memory accessibility). In a survey, faculty from psychology departments in R1 institutions in the United States listed up to five names they considered experts in their field and up to five names they considered rising stars (defined as pretenure) in their field. Results revealed that the proportion of female experts recalled by women generally matched the percentage of more senior female faculty at R1 institutions, whereas the proportion recalled by men was much lower as compared to this baseline. With rising stars, we observed both underrepresentation of women from male participants and, unexpectedly, overrepresentation of women from female participants, as compared to the percentage of more junior female faculty at R1 institutions. For both experts and rising stars, male names were also more likely to be generated earlier in lists by male respondents, but women did not vary in the order in which they listed women versus men. Despite the differences in recall observed in our data, there was no such gap in name recognition, suggesting that the gap is one of accessibility-who comes to mind. Implications and recommendations for psychology researchers are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Citation · Demographic economics · Developmental psychology · Gender gap · Political science · Academic Writing and Publishing · Psychology · Law · Social Psychology

  • Do vulnerable social identities of faculty matter when predicting their inclusive practices at university

    Open Access•José Luis Álvarez-Castillo, Gemma Fernandez-Caminero et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Gender Bias Against Women and Girls in Brilliance-Required Contexts

    Open Access•Seowoo Kim, Lin Bian et al.•Sex Roles•2025

  • Africa's Cultural Heritage and International Cultural Heritage Law

    Open Access•Valentina Vadi•International Journal of Cultural…•2024

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae