In defense of the passive voice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8712723 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernanda Ferreira (0000-0002-9349-9300, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 145-153 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/amp0000620 |
| PMID | 32191045 |
| OpenAlex | W3012471697 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 3 |
Writers of scientific articles are familiar with the advice to avoid using the passive voice. Prescriptivists argue that the passive leads to bloated, indirect, and even evasive writing, and they recommend that the active form be used instead. This article defends the passive voice against these charges and argues that this advice is misguided. The article begins with a summary of the passive construction and the diversity of its forms, many of which are not appreciated in discussions of the passive voice's purported flaws, and is then followed by a summary of why some prescriptivists criticize its use. Three motivations for the use of the passive voice based on findings from psycholinguistic research are then described: First, the passive form allows writers to maintain topic continuity and conform to the given-new principle of communication; 2nd, speakers use the passive voice to accommodate concepts that are accessible; and 3rd, passive sentences are not communicatively equivalent to actives, and therefore active sentence paraphrases will sometimes distort the writer's message. An additional problem with the advice to avoid passive sentences is that people have trouble correctly identifying them and tend to rely on superficial cues that often diagnose other irrelevant grammatical constructions. Just as rules against split infinitives, stranded prepositions, and the singular they have been abandoned, so too should the prohibition against the passive voice. Instead of shunning a perfectly grammatical and useful construction, writers should strive to generate prose that is clear and elegant, using all the linguistic tools at their disposal. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Communication
Construing voice and agency in medical students’ writing
The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding
The passive voice in the Holy Quran
How do cohesion features inform science instruction for English learners
A developmental study of Hebrew text reconstruction
Developmental Language Disorder
To what extent does the general public endorse language myths
Shaping Attributions of Crisis Responsibility in the Case of an Accusation
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |