Should Articles Be Published in Full
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8713111 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H J Eysenck (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1950 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 678-678 |
| Publication date | 1950-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/h0061396 |
| OpenAlex | W2025917804 |
| Language | EN |
Notes the Council of Representatives of the APA adopted a resolution that the editors of the APA journals be instructed to recommend to authors they delete from manuscripts certain materials such as lengthy tables, detailed descriptions of procedure, instructions to subjects, individual protocols, and the like. This section of each article should be sent to the American Documentation Institute for preservation and circulation on request. The purpose of this recommendation is to increase the amount of material available to scholars. Having been able, if only at second hand, to see the results of this resolution, I would like to suggest while it may succeed in its main purpose, it will almost inevitably have other results which must make anyone who is interested in the development of psychology as a science feel somewhat uneasy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Documentation · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · PsycINFO · Section (typography · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Computer Science · Psychology · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |