Integrating systems of power and privilege in the study of resilience

Bibliographic Data

ID8714186
AuthorsKate C Mclean (0000-0003-3973-1786, corresponding author), Jillian Fish (0000-0001-5308-9174), Leoandra Onnie Rogers (0000-0001-5526-2292), Moin Syed (0000-0003-4759-3555)
Year2024
Volume79
Issue8
Pages999-1011
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/amp0001260
PMID39531702
OpenAlexW4404270985
LanguageEN
Citations received9

Although current approaches to the study of resilience acknowledge the role of context, rarely do those conceptualizations attend to societal systems and structures that include hierarchies of power and privilege-namely systems of racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and capitalism-nor do they articulate how these structural realities are embedded within individual experiences. We offer critiques of the current literature from this structural lens, using the concept of master narratives to articulate the incomplete and, at times, damaging story that the discipline of psychology has told about resilience. We then provide three models that center history, systems, and structures of society that can be employed in the study of resilience. We close with lessons learned from listening to those voices who have been marginalized by mainstream society, lessons that require us to redefine, broaden, and deepen our conceptualization of resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Computer security · Power (physics · Privilege (computing · Resilience (materials science · Sociology · Computer Science · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOI