Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The use and abuse of religious beliefs in dividing and conquering between socially marginalized groups

The same-sex marriage debate

Bibliographic Data

ID8715487
AuthorsBeverly Greene (corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume64
Issue8
Pages698-709
Publication date2009-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.698
PMID19899873
OpenAlexW2170351132
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited1

This article discusses the use and abuse of religious beliefs and their role in divide-and-conquer strategies. Divide-and-conquer strategies are engaged to disrupt potential coalitions between and among marginalized group members, specifically sexual minority groups and people of color. Tensions between these groups have been exacerbated by the debate on same-sex marriage and comparisons between the discriminatory treatment of each group. A component of this discussion includes a brief exploration of one of the historical abuses of religious doctrine used to legitimize the marginalization of people of color and sexual minorities in the United States. For African Americans, one form of marginalization was reflected in criminalizing interracial marriage, and for members of sexual minority groups, a form of marginalization is denying group members the right to marry. The author also explores culturally competent and respectful disciplinary and clinical responses to religiously derived prejudice against sexual minority group members and people of color and discusses the implications for multicultural discourse

Criminology · Doctrine · Ethnic group · Minority group · Multiculturalism · People of color · Political science · Prejudice (legal term · Race (biology · Sexual minority · Sexual orientation · Sociology · Women of color · American Constitutional Law and Politics · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Gender Studies · Law · Social Psychology

  • Christian campus-ministry groups at public universities and opposition to same-sex marriage

    Nathan R Todd, Elizabeth A Mcconnell et al.•Psychology of Religion and…•2017

  • Predicting Attitudes towards Lesbians and Gay Men

    Open Access•Elise Choe, Emily Srisarajivakul et al.•Journal of Psychology and Theology•2019

  • Riding Trojan Horses from Symbolism to Structural Change

    Open Access•Beverly Greene•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2010

  • Same-Sex Marriage and the Boundaries of Diversity

    Christopher H Rosik•Marriage & Family Review•2014

  • Against Nature

    Open Access•Elizabeth R Cole, L R Avery et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2012

  • It Really Is Not Just Gay, but African American Gay

    Clare F Walsh, Clare Walsh•Journal of Homosexuality•2016

  • Intersectionality and research in psychology

    Elizabeth R Cole•American Psychologist•2009

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2010 - 2019 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae