Evidence-based care for suicidality as an ethical and professional imperative
How to decrease suicidal suffering and save lives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8715798 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David A Jobes (0000-0002-7370-3298, corresponding author), Jeffrey E Barnett (0000-0003-0664-4168) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 311-322 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/amp0001325 |
| PMID | 38695782 |
| OpenAlex | W4396580622 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Suicide is a major public and mental health problem in the United States and around the world. According to recent survey research, there were 16,600,000 American adults and adolescents in 2022 who reported having serious thoughts of suicide (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2023), which underscores a profound need for effective clinical care for people who are suicidal. Yet there is evidence that clinical providers may avoid patients who are suicidal (out of fear and perceived concerns about malpractice liability) and that too many rely on interventions (i.e., inpatient hospitalization and medications) that have little to no evidence for decreasing suicidal ideation and behavior (and may even increase risk). Fortunately, there is an emerging and robust evidence-based clinical literature on suicide-related assessment, acute clinical stabilization, and the actual treatment of suicide risk through psychological interventions supported by replicated randomized controlled trials. Considering the pervasiveness of suicidality, the life versus death implications, and the availability of proven approaches, it is argued that providers should embrace evidence-based practices for suicidal risk as their best possible risk management strategy . Such an embrace is entirely consistent with expert recommendations as well as professional and ethical standards. Finally, a call to action is made with a series of specific recommendations to help psychologists (and other disciplines) use evidence-based, suicide-specific, approaches to help decrease suicide-related suffering and deaths. It is argued that doing so has now become both an ethical and professional imperative . Given the challenge of this issue, it is also simply the right thing to do. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)
Injury prevention · Medical emergency · Mental health · Poison control · Psychiatry · Public health · Suicidal behavior · Suicidal ideation · Suicide prevention · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies · Clinical Psychology
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |