"The History of "Quasquicentennial
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8727482 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Chapman (0000-0003-1220-6068, corresponding author), Robert L Chapman (0000-0001-9705-4002) |
| Year | 1965 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 53-53 |
| Publication date | 1965-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/454178 |
| OpenAlex | W2323973883 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
H W. FOWLER IN Modern English Usage compares the usual British form . centenary and the American centennial as nouns meaning 'hundredth anniversary,' remarking that the American word gives a less convenient pattern for forming the names of higher anniversaries. As these are sometimes wanted, it is worth while to maintain centenary. Fowler goes on as follows: The shots made at these higher names often resulting in monstrosities, a list of not intolerable forms is here offered.1
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,02 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 1978 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |