Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Slang and Bible Translation

Bibliographic Data

ID8727587
AuthorsSteven T Byington (corresponding author)
Year1932
Volume7
Issue3
Pages188-188
Publication date1932-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/451649
OpenAlexW2327479671
LanguageEN
Citations received1

HE work of making a new translation of the Bible, on which I have for years been engaged, is bound sooner or later to lead to some reflections on the subject of slang: its essential characteristics, its merits and demerits, and the question of its possible use in translating the Bible. Not, of course, that anybody would think of filling the Bible with slang from cover to cover. The first chapter of Genesis or of Ephesians, the eighth chapter of First Kings or of Romans, are small samples of a. great volume of matter for which slang will never suggest itself as an appropriate treatment. But there are other sorts too. When the Bible is recording the words of a young child, of a street mob besieging the door of a too-respectable citizen, of a gang of wire-pulling politicians gleefully sneering at an opponent whom they now see safely nailed to the cross, of an ex-bandit who, after many years on the throne, finds himself without warning thrown back into the old conditions of his life as a leader of outlaws, of a paranoiac venting his insane suspicions that everybody, and particularly those naturally nearest to him, are plotting against him, there is no particular presumption that the translator ought to make them speak dignifiedly. Nay, extensive and important parts of the Bible are reports of the words of popular revivalist preachers who had avowedly had poor opportunities of polite culture in their earlier years; should the translator make them talk like D. L. Moody or like Billy Sunday, or one of them like Moody and another like Sunday? Against such temptations the main reply is that slang is essentially ephemeral. It hardly passes muster among its users when it is no longer the latest thing. To be sure, some phrases have lived for centuries on a level as low as slang; as I write this page, a lady says to me six of one and half a dozen of the other, to use a vulgarism, which I think is rather finicky of her. But typical slang is only of a day. Consequently, if slang were put into a translation of the Bible, the book would live only about ten years before it would begin to seem out of date. Then one could not afford to spend on it, for so short a life, the amount of painstaking that ought to go into a translation of the Bible. My reputation as a translator, what there is of it, was 188

Art · Biology · Linguistics · Literature · Slang · Translation (biology · Lexicography and Language Studies · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism · Translation Studies and Practices · History · Philosophy

  • The World by Gaslight

    Elizabeth Kelly Gray•American Nineteenth Century History•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.06
Citation span2009 - 2009 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae