Subject-Verb Agreement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8728827 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert C Pooley (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1934 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-31 |
| Publication date | 1934-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/451984 |
| OpenAlex | W2314472887 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
ject and the verb in idiomatic English constructions. Despite several centuries of rule-making and school-teaching, in which formal concord has always been vigorously imposed, the free idiom of English overleaps the restraining barriers again and again to produce constructions eminently fitting for exact communication, though horrifying to grammarians and logicians. In this article an attempt is made to classify some of the more common instances of non
Agreement · Library science · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Subject (documents · Verb · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Mathematics · Psychology · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,26 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2025 (23) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |