The Hampton Court Painting of the Field of Cloth of Gold Considered as an Historical Document
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8881537 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sydney Anglo (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 287-307 |
| Publication date | 1966-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Antiquaries Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-5815 • E-ISSN: 1758-5309 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003581500053312 |
| OpenAlex | W1969505654 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 2 |
On 29th March 1770, Sir Joseph Ayloffe, Vice-President of the Society of Antiquaries, read a learned paper to his colleagues on a painting, then at Windsor Castle and now preserved at Hampton Court, depicting the interview of June 1520 between Henry VIII and Francis I at the Field of Cloth of Gold. Ayloffe presented a long and minutely circumstantial account of the painting, which, in view of the considerable deterioration of the canvas over the last 200 years, is of inestimable value for details concerning colour and design. He also compared the painting with such documentary evidence as was available at the time, and concluded that it was an accurate representation of major features of the Anglo-French interview. Since Ayloffe's time a mass of contemporary descriptive source material has come to light, and it has even been thought that the profusion of seemingly inconsistent details relating to the Field of Cloth of Gold renders impossible any attempt to reconcile the documentary records either one with another or with the pictorial representation. However, a close examination of the sources reveals several fundamental consistencies which enable us to reconstruct, with reasonable certitude, both the scene and the events at the Field of Cloth of Gold: and this synthesis may be used to check the value and authenticity of the Hampton Court painting as an historical document
Archaeology · Art · Art history · Circumstantial evidence · Documentary evidence · Field (mathematics · Painting · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Value (mathematics · Visual arts · Windsor · Computer Science · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1982 - 2022 (41) |
| Highly cited | No |