Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's Evangeline
A Tale of Acadie and the Ambiguous Afterlife of the History of the Acadians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8894797 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Niemeyer (0000-0001-7091-536X, Centre Interlangues, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 121-145 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Review of American Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-7720 • E-ISSN: 1710-114X |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cras.2017.003 |
| OpenAlex | W2604169557 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
Longfellow's Evangeline was hailed as a great and distinctively American work when it appeared in 1847, and the poem's use of North American history was a key element in its favourable reception. This use of history, however, is ambiguous and complex. The epic continues, first of all, in a long tradition of romanticized retellings of the heart-rending story of the Acadians. But the work also engages in a dual-level dialogue with both the mid-eighteenth-century history of the Acadians, who are pitied, without inciting indignation, and the contemporary history of mid-nineteenth-century America, whose expansionism it both implicitly celebrates and criticizes
Afterlife · Ancient history · Art · Chariot · Dual (grammatical number · Element (criminal law · EPIC · Expansionism · History of literature · Indignation · Key (lock · Literature · Poetry · American and British Literature Analysis · Canadian Identity and History · Historical and Literary Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
The Machine in the Garden
The Contexts of Acadian History, 1686-1784
"The Origin and Development of Longfellow's "Evangeline
Sentimental Collaborations
A Great and Noble Scheme
Sentimental Men
Longfellow
The Call of the Archetype and the Challenge of Acadian History
The Contexts of Acadian History, 1686-1784
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |