Race and Reading
The Burden of Huckleberry Finn
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8894874 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frances W Kaye (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 13-48 |
| Publication date | 1999-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Review of American Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-7720 • E-ISSN: 1710-114X |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cras-029-01-02 |
| OpenAlex | W2011410585 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
For the great mass of admiring readers, because Huck and Jim are friends, and because Jim is finally emancipated, the novel's ambiguities are simply dissolved in an overflow of relief and warm fellow-feeling.... Huckleberry Finn continues to be our favorite story about slavery and race because it gives us no more of this reality than we can bear. (Robinson 1986, 119) Race and slavery, as almost all readers now acknowledge, are central to Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn, the great American novel. Twain's episodic, beautiful, ambivalent, cruel, and liberating tale of the Mississippi Valley in 1840 has become the universal story of bondage and freedom and the most widely taught novel in the United States. Yet if we read the novel carefully, against the context of the time Twain was writing in as well as in the context of our own time, we must recognize, with Forrest Robinson, that "it gives us no more of this reality than we can bear," that it enables its American readers to approach the most profoundly troubling issue in their history without risk of being overcome with the fear and guilt that attach to the subject. We return to the novel not because of what it resolves, but because it seduces us with a comedic image of resolution that we cannot quite accept, but that we permit, by a lie of silent assertion, to stand in place of much darker revelations. (Robinson 1986, 217)
Ambivalence · American literature · Art · Assertion · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Feeling · Literature · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Race (biology · Reading (process · Sociology · Subject (documents · American Literature and Humor Studies · Computer Science · Gender Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |