Literary Biography and Psychological Criticism
In the Matter of H. P. Lovecraft
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8895058 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen A Black, Stephen Black (0000-0002-9509-2870, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 243-250 |
| Publication date | 1979-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Review of American Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-7720 • E-ISSN: 1710-114X |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cras-010-02-11 |
| OpenAlex | W2044406983 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
L. Sprague de Camp. Lovecraft: A Biography. New York: Ballantine Books, 1976. 480 pp. (Abridgement of the first edition, Doubleday, 1975). Frank Belknap Long. Howard Philips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House, 1975. 237 + xiv pp. Barton Levi St. Armand. The Roots of Horror in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Elizabethtown, N.Y.: Dragon Press, 1977. 102 + viii pp. Psychological criticism, we can't get away from it, any more than we can avoid psychiatric ideas when we try to understand the people we know. Psycho- logical notions pervade our language and the assumptions beneath our views of the world. I think that one can hardly pick up a twentieth-century book about literature that is not psychological, although no great number set out to be so, and fewer still are well informed psychologically. A few literary scholars have troubled themselves to undertake disciplined psychological study, and to publish scholarly work that reflects the discipline. Yet such study in itself cannot guarantee an account of a literary work or an author that makes one exclaim, "Now I understand! Now I know what I was feeling and thinking!" It is as easy to intellectualize the blood and guts out of a story or author with psychological ideas as with, say, philosophical ideas. Having a bias in favor of scholarship that gives me a sense of the humanly credible, as well as several years of formal training in the discipline of psychoanalysis, I find myself evaluating literary studies as follows: if psychological thinking does or should play a significant role in the understanding of the scholar's subject, then the reader may rightfully expect the scholar to behave respon- sibly in his use of psychology or in his rejection of psychological explanation
Art · Biography · Criticism · Epistemology · Feeling · Literary criticism · Literature · Psychoanalysis · Scholarship · Sociology · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Law · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,02 |
| Citation span | 1981 - 1981 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |