Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modern Liberty, Partisanship, and Identity

On Mark Lilla and Yuval Levin

Bibliographic Data

ID8895962
AuthorsTrevor Shelley (0000-0002-2529-1647, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume52
Issue2
Pages206-228
Publication date2022-05-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Review of American Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-7720 • E-ISSN: 1710-114X
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/cras-2021-011
OpenAlexW4280583986
LanguageEN
References cited14

Applying Pierre Manent’s description of the modern regime as an “organization of separations,” this essay retraces the respective developmental accounts of this regime in the early works of Yuval Levin and Mark Lilla—who each analyze a particular separation—and demonstrates its influence on their more recent American political commentary. We gain a deeper understanding of key differences in conservative and liberal approaches to revitalizing contemporary civic life and renewed appreciation for the inescapability of partisanship in thinking and acting politically. Both Levin and Lilla—scholars and public intellectuals alike—emphasize the importance of reason in undergirding free and deliberative politics, but they differ on how it emerges and is best upheld, which in turn influences their proposed remedies for today’s growing individualism, meeting the challenge of identity politics, and restoring moderation to the present political situation. This essay thereby demonstrates that foundational thinking shapes analyses and prognoses of present political discontents, as much as contemporary concerns about partisanship and identity are endogenous to modern liberty

Aesthetics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Identity (music · Individualism · Moderation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Social Psychology · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Who Are We?

    Anita Smith•Who Are We?•2012

  • The Politics

    Aristotle Aristotle, Carnes Lord•Politics•1984

  • Why Liberalism Failed

    Open Access•Patrick J Deneen•Why Liberalism Failed•2018

  • Democracy in America

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Harvey C Mansfield et al.•Democracy in America•2000

  • The Great Debate

    Open Access•Mark Scully•The Forum•2015

  • The Once and Future Liberal

    Carl Eric Scott•Perspectives on Political Science•2018

  • The Fragility of Freedom

    Anne C Rose, Joshua Mitchell•Journal of American History•1996

  • A World beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State

    Open Access•Marc G Doucet•Canadian Journal of Political…•2007

  • The philosophical discourse of modernity

    Jürgen Habermas•The philosophical discourse of…•1987

  • The Shipwrecked Mind

    Wayne Cristaudo•The European Legacy•2018

  • Faces of Moderation

    K Steven Vincent•The European Legacy•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae