The Concert of the Caribbean in the Politics of Language regarding The Bandung Peoples
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8901083 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Keith E Baird (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 16-24 |
| Publication date | 2000-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Caribbean Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-6495 • E-ISSN: 2470-6302 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00086495.2000.11672114 |
| OpenAlex | W134280219 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
It is a matter of historical fact that European nations have utilized military power to establish and maintain rule over indigenous peoples of Africa, Asia, and the Americas. What is not so readily apparent is that these dominating nations have devised and deployed terms of discourse in their languages which serve to justify, confirm and perpetuate their ascendancy over the subjugated peoples. The dominators have promulgated their own account of their imperialist activity and defined to their own advantage the identity, status, and appropriate destiny of the dominated. In this way, the European overlords (and their neo-European inheritors and continuators in the Americas) determined how the historic encounter between European and non-European peoples was to be conceptualized and in what terms of discourse it was to be discussed
Aesthetics · Destiny (ISS module · Ethnology · Identity (music · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Anthropology · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · Law · Travel Writing and Literature
Travel Fact and Travel Fiction
The Rhetoric of Empire
Man’S Most Dangerous Myth
Geography, empire and social theory
Three Worlds of Development. The Theory and Practice of International Stratification
Carib cannibalism. The historical evidence
Man's Most Dangerous Myth
Three Worlds of Development
Making Empire Respectable
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |