Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An “Historicist” Reading of Peirce's Pragmatist Semeiotic

A Pivotal Maxim and Evolving Practices

Bibliographic Data

ID8903147
AuthorsColapietro Colapietro (corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume56
Issue3
Pages374-374
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-1774 • E-ISSN: 1558-9587
PublisherIndiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.3.04
OpenAlexW3123562611
LanguageEN

What would happen to Peirce’s study of signs if we did not focus to such a great extent on such phenomena as a sunflower turning toward the sun, or a person knocking on a door, or the formation of a fossil, or even a string of sentences woven into a text such as a literary essay or scientific memoir, but rather preoccupied ourselves with such complex and open-ended phenomena as the history of a science (say, the science of biology)? Would this make any difference for how we (for example) conceive the object of semiosis? Moreover, do not the paradigmatic instances of the experimental sciences in which Peirce was most interested display their vitality as much as anywhere in the continual refashioning (at least, rethinking) of their most basic concepts? These are the questions with which the author of this essay concerns himself

Art · Epistemology · Historicism · Linguistics · Literature · Maxim · Pragmatism · Reading (process · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae