Commemorating Royce — Revisiting The Royce Festschrift
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8903309 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robin Friedman (corresponding author), Robin Friedman Robin Friedman |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-201 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-1774 • E-ISSN: 1558-9587 |
| Publisher | Indiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.52.2.05 |
| OpenAlex | W2519919683 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
As we commemorate the centennial of Royce's death, it is valuable to remember earlier attempts to assess Royce's significance on commemorative occasions. This paper examines the 1915 "Papers in Honor of Josiah Royce on his Sixtieth Birthday" which formed the basis for a 1916 commemorative festschrift. I explore the background of the festschrift and offer guidance for approaching the papers by commenting on the festschrift paper of Morris Raphael Cohen. I examine the papers submitted by John Dewey, Mary Calkins, and Charles Bakewell and their relationships to one another. The paper suggests throughout the importance of biography in thinking about philosophical questions. I tie the papers by Dewey, Calkins, and Bakewell into current thinking about Royce. I argue that the broad outlines of their papers, based on voluntarism, personalism, and community, remain important for thinking about Royce during this commemorative year
Art history · Biography · Centennial · Epistemology · Honor · Personalism · Sociology · Voluntarism (philosophy · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Classics · Computer Science · History · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |