Measuring What Outcomes Matters Most to People When Accessing Suicide Postvention Support

Funding for suicide postvention services, which provide support after a suicide death, has increased in Australia and globally. This rise accompanies a need to demonstrate outcomes of support. However, articulating and quantifying these outcomes presents ethical and logistical challenges. Funders' priorities may differ from those of service users. To discern the value and explore effective measurement of postvention outcomes, focus groups were conducted with postvention staff and lived experience representatives from an Australian postvention service. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Results highlighted the complex context of measuring outcomes in suicide postvention and emphasized the need for flexible approaches to service provision and outcome measurement. The study suggests that the most significant benefits, as perceived by participants, are the 'flow-on' effects of postvention. It supports the notion that outcome measures require careful consideration, with trade-offs evaluated to understand what is truly valuable in suicide postvention services

Context (archaeology · Focus group · Medical education · Medical emergency · Poison control · Qualitative research · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Thematic analysis · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Nursing · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

• Effectiveness and Acceptability of Traumatic Bereavement Interventions

  Open Access•Elahe Derakhshan, Bonnie Scarth et al.•Journal of Loss and Trauma•2026

  Incluir item

• Measuring the outcomes of support after suicide

  Open Access•B V Jackson, Sarah Wayland et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  Incluir item

• A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

  Open Access•Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska et al.•The Patient - Patient-Centered…•2014

  Incluir item

• The Continuum of “Survivorship”

  Open Access•Julie Cerel, John L Mcintosh et al.•Suicide and Life-Threatening…•2014

  Incluir item

• How Many People Are Exposed to Suicide? Not Six

  Open Access•Julie Cerel, Margaret M Brown et al.•Suicide and Life-Threatening…•2019

  Incluir item

• A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis

  Open Access•David Byrne•Quality & Quantity•2022

  Incluir item

• Challenges in evaluating adult bereavement services

  Henk Schut, Margaret Stroebe et al.•Bereavement Care•2011

  Incluir item

• Priorities for the development and evaluation of support after suicide bereavement in the UK

  Alexandra L Pitman, Alexandra Pitman et al.•Bereavement Care•2016

  Incluir item

• Developing the craft

  Lisa R Trainor, Andrea Bundon•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2021

  Incluir item

• Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

  Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2019

  Incluir item

• Measuring the outcomes of support provided to people after a suicide or other sudden bereavement

  Open Access•B V Jackson, Sarah Wayland et al.•Death Studies•2026

  Incluir item

• Unveiling studies on self-healing practices for suicide loss survivors

  Open Access•Adelia Khrisna Putri, Gregory Armstrong et al.•Death Studies•2024

  Incluir item

• One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis

  Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

  Incluir item

• Understanding self-healing

  Adelia Khrisna Putri, Arka Nareswari et al.•Death Studies•2024

  Incluir item

• Using thematic analysis in psychology

  Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  Incluir item