Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Styles of Reasoning in Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground and Sōseki's Kokoro

Bibliographic Data

ID8910606
AuthorsScott Mehl (0000-0002-4503-7160, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume54
Issue3
Pages489-517
Publication date2017-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Literature Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-4132 • E-ISSN: 1528-4212
PublisherThe Pennsylvania State University Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5325/complitstudies.54.3.0489
OpenAlexW2745436646
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Adapting a term coined by Ian Hacking, this article analyzes certain of the styles of reasoning that appear in two novels, Fyodor Dostoevsky's Zapiski iz podpol'ya (Notes from Underground, 1864) and Natsume Sōseki's Kokoro (1914). The confession of the underground man, the protagonist of Dostoevsky's novel, includes an argument against the Chernyshevskian doctrine of rational egoism. The underground man's argument may, as this article shows, be analyzed using logical truth tables to demonstrate that, however thorough the underground man's argument may appear, it does not consider the counterexample of selfless altruism. This omission prepares the way for the underground man's rejection of Liza at the climax of the second part of the novel. Sōseki's novel, too, contains a confession, namely Sensei's testament, in which Sensei relates how he arrived at his belief that humanity is fundamentally selfish. Sensei's style of reasoning is primarily inductive, in contrast with that of other characters in Sōseki's novel, and the present article argues that Sensei's style of reasoning is a primary cause of his suicide. In each novel, then, there is a sustained consideration of how and to what extent a style of reasoning is bound up with a character's fate

Argument (complex analysis · Art · Confession (law · Epistemology · Humanity · Literature · Style (visual arts · Theology · Education, Literature, Philosophy Research · Law · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies

  • Observing logics

    Open Access•Eunseo Kim•Studies in East European Thought•2024

  • Truth, Fiction, and Literature

    Peter Lamarque, Stein Haugom Olsen•Truth, Fiction, and Literature•1996

  • A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature

    Open Access•Garry L Hagberg, Walter Jost•Companion to the Philosophy of…•2010

  • The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and Philosophy

    Open Access•Anthony J Cascardi•Cambridge Introduction to…•2014

  • The Encyclopedia of philosophy

    Paul Edwards•The Encyclopedia of philosophy•1996

  • Three Modern Novelists

    Rebecca L Copeland, Van C Gessel•The Journal of the Association of…•1994

  • Dostoevsky

    Robert L Belknap, Joseph Frank•The Slavic and East European…•1988

  • Fiction's Overcoat

    Jeff Love, Edith W Clowes•The Slavic and East European…•2005

  • Notes from Underground and the Grand Inquisitor

    Walter N Vickery, Walter Vickery et al.•The Slavic and East European…•1961

  • What Is to Be Done

    C Moser, Charles A Moser et al.•The Slavic and East European…•1990

  • The Art of Dostoevsky

    Donald Fanger, Robert L Jackson•The Russian Review•1982

  • The Dilemma of the Modern in Japanese Fiction

    Reiko Abe Auestad, Dennis Washburn et al.•Journal of Japanese Studies•1996

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae