Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When Did Norway and Denmark Get Distinctively Foreign Policies

Bibliographic Data

ID8912357
AuthorsIver B Neumann (0000-0002-1199-2813, Oslo University and Research Professor, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume42
Issue1
Pages53-72
Publication date2007-02-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCooperation and Conflict (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-8367 • E-ISSN: 1460-3691
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0010836707073476
OpenAlexW2055751446
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited6

The emergence of the modern state and the European states system limned the inside of a state different from its outside. Inside the state, peace and progress could be furthered by means of disciplinary power, while outside the state, anarchy reigned. Academic disciplines such as political theory, International Relations and International History treat this divide as foundational, and so the knowledge they produce contributes to its reproduction. The article traces the emergence of the divide where Norway and Denmark are concerned through a reading of the concept of ‘realm’ ( rike ), and asks when Norway evolved a foreign policy (as distinct from a non-discriminating foreign/domestic one). There are two extant views. A legal view starts from sovereignty and fixes the date at 1905, whereas a nationalistic view popular with historians treats it as originary to the political entity of Norway, which means that it may be dated back some thousand years or so. Treating discriminating institutions such as foreign ministries as preconditions for the existence of a permanent divide between inside and outside, the article suggests the end of the eighteenth century. One may speculate that the firming of the divide is related to the rise of nationalism, in which case it is not surprising that the two phenomena fade concurrently. Since Nordic cooperation stood out as a special phenomenon in international relations because of the particular way in which it handled the domestic/foreign divide, Nordic cooperation will lose its role as special in the degree to which the domestic/foreign divide becomes less foundational

Discipline · Foreign policy · Foreign policy analysis · Foreign relations · Great power · International relations · Law and economics · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Realm · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Balkan and Eastern European Studies · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law

  • Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World

    Gunther Hellmann, Knud Erik Jørgensen•Theorizing Foreign Policy in a…•2015

  • Policy Ideas and North–South Research Cooperation

    Open Access•Julian Weinrib, Creso Sá•Journal of Studies in International…•2020

  • Peace Diplomacy and the Domestic Dimension of N orwegian Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Katarzyna Pisarska•Scandinavian Political Studies•2015

  • A Genealogy of Sovereignty

    Open Access•Jens Bartelson•Genealogy of Sovereignty•1995

  • A region-building approach to Northern Europe

    Open Access•Iver B Neumann•Review of International Studies•1994

  • The practice of diplomacy

    James Cable•International Affairs•1995

  • Nordic Security Cooperation in a Homogenized Political Setting

    Open Access•Iver B Neumann•Cooperation and Conflict•1996

  • The British Diplomatic Service, 1689-1789

    Dora Mae Clark, D B Horn•The William and Mary Quarterly•1962

Citations per year0.27
Citation span2015 - 2020 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae