Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving Measurement via Item Response Theory

Great Idea, But Hold the Rasch

Bibliographic Data

ID8914856
AuthorsRobert J Harvey (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA), Richard J Harvey (0000-0002-6942-8975, Virginia Tech, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume44
Issue2
Pages195-204
Publication date2016-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Counseling Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-0000 • E-ISSN: 1552-3861
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0011000015615427
OpenAlexW2274257953
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited23

In my reaction to the major contribution by Mallinckrodt, Miles, and Recabarren, I endorse their recommendation that the use of item response theory (IRT) be increased. Advantages of IRT are numerous, with most resulting from the fact that IRT models typically take a more realistic view of how item responses are related to underlying traits than classical test theory. However, I raise concerns regarding their advocacy of the Rasch IRT model, which arguably takes an overly simplistic view of how items and traits are related. Many alternative IRT models exist, including ones based on the ideal-point measurement philosophy (most IRT models use the dominance model). I recommend that researchers seek to determine which IRT model best fits their items—including the larger question of whether a dominance versus ideal-point approach is preferable—and avoid assuming that one model will always perform the best

Classical test theory · Cognitive psychology · Dominance (genetics · Econometrics · Epistemology · Ideal (ethics · Ideal point · Item response theory · Mallinckrodt · Point (geometry · Psychometrics · Rasch model · Cultural Differences and Values · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Coercive Control in the Courtroom

    Open Access•Ellen Gutowski, Lisa A Goodman•Journal of Family Violence•2022

  • Reconsidering Focus Groups and Rasch Model Item Response Theory in Instrument Development

    Open Access•Joseph R Miles, Brent Mallinckrodt et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2016

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • The new rules of measurement.

    Susan E Embretson•Psychological Assessment•1996

  • A law of comparative judgment.

    L L Thurstone•Psychological Review•1927

  • Solving Measurement Problems With the Rasch Model

    Open Access•Benjamin D Wright•Journal of Educational Measurement•1977

  • The Rasch wars

    Open Access•Tim Mcnamara, Ute Knoch•Language Testing•2012

  • Computerized adaptive personality assessment

    Niels G Waller, Steve P Reise•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Item Response Theory

    Open Access•Robert J Harvey, Richard J Harvey et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•1999

  • Using Focus Groups and Rasch Item Response Theory to Improve Instrument Development

    Open Access•Brent Mallinckrodt, Joseph R Miles et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2015

  • Attitudes Can Be Measured

    L L Thurstone•American Journal of Sociology•1928

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2022 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae