Black Movies/Black Theatre
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8918319 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James P Murray (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 56-61 |
| Publication date | 1972-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Drama Review TDR (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-5962 • E-ISSN: 2326-2060 |
| Publisher | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1144754 |
| OpenAlex | W2797223618 |
| Language | EN |
Film has become a threat to small community theatre groups, such as those in Harlem. Even a group like the New Lafayette, which has an international reputation and presents three to four major plays a year, has found its best productions playing to half-empty houses. Despite maintaining high artistic standards, black theatre groups have encountered tremendous frustration in trying to develop a large, black audience that will come back show after show. The fact is that black theatre today is not thriving—only surviving. And movies can assume a great deal of the blame. It is estimated that blacks spend $120 million annually at the film box offices in the United States. Some 50 feature films aimed at a black audience were produced between 1970 and 1972. And an average of four a month were released over this past summer. Down the street from the Ethel Barrymore Theatre, where Don't Play us Cheap spent three months, the effect of the so-called “black film boom“ on Broadway was overwhelming
Advertising · Art · Boom · Business · Media studies · Political science · Reputation · Social science · Sociology · Thriving · Visual arts · Engineering · History · Law · Race, History, and American Society · Theater, Performance, and Music History
| Highly cited | No |
|---|