Audience Participation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8918336 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Schechner (0000-0001-9303-6261, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1971 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 72-89 |
| Publication date | 1971-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Drama Review TDR (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-5962 • E-ISSN: 2326-2060 |
| Publisher | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1144682 |
| OpenAlex | W4242374723 |
| Language | EN |
Many think that because participation is new to them, it is new to the theatre. These same people automatically participate in responsive readings at church, flag saluting, standing for the national anthem at sporting matches, cheering, and agreeing to umpire a few innings of sandlot baseball. In fact, participation in theatrical events is a very old, widespread practice. It has been limited in our culture for several hundred years for a variety of reasons. Chief among these is “professionalism.” Because trained, skilled performers have come to be expected, there are those who grow uneasy contemplating direct interaction between performers and the unskilled audience. The audience, by and large, expects a show to begin and end on time, to be “finished” and “packaged” like other products of the Ameriaan culture. Therefore, many in the theatre are loath to risk a process that may upend these anticipations, such as accepting a rough or long performance, or not being sure how something is going to work
Advertising · Aesthetics · Anthem · Art · Audience participation · Business · Flag (linear algebra · Media studies · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Work (physics · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Engineering · History · Theatre and Performance Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|