Cecil Sharp in Somerset
Some Reflections on the Work of David Harker
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8934793 |
|---|---|
| Autores | C J Bearman (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2002 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 11-34 |
| Data de publicação | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Folklore (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0015-587X • E-ISSN: 1469-8315 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00155870220125426 |
| OpenAlex | W2077736940 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 4 |
David Harker's criticism of Cecil Sharp's work has been called the beginning of serious critical work on the early folk music movement, and it has become an orthodoxy which later commentary has accepted without question, taking its accuracy and the validity of its research base on trust. This article shows that the trust has been misplaced. It uses a fresh, more complete and more rigorous analysis of the Sharp MSS to show that Harker's criticism is inaccurate, innumerate, flawed in its methods, and unjustified in its assumptions. It forces a reassessment both of Sharp's work and of Harker's, and renders untenable many of the assumptions upon which modern interpretations of the early folk music movement in Britain are based
Aesthetics · Art · Criticism · Epistemology · Literature · Movement (music · Orthodoxy · Sociology · Theology · Work (physics · Engineering · Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies · History · Music History and Culture · Philippine History and Culture · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2006 - 2014 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |