Social sustainability for whom? The role of discursive boundary objects in Swedish strategic urban planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8941985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hannah Saldert (0000-0003-2253-0013, University West, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 152 |
| Pages | 104022-104022 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104022 |
| OpenAlex | W4396842290 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
This paper provides further understanding of how social sustainability functions as a discursive boundary object, by exploring how it is artefactually anchored during the planning process, and how this anchoring affects the discourse of social sustainability. This is explored in a Swedish strategic planning project – the RiverCity in Gothenburg – where social sustainability is the desired policy objective. This paper traces how the discourse of social sustainability shifted during the planning process (2012–2019) and shows how social sustainability contains two levels of meaning, substantives aspects of what a socially sustainable city is and procedural of how to achieve it. The substantive level functions as a boundary object between policy areas, however, the procedural level leads to goal conflicts when it is translated and artefactually anchored by different municipal departments. The findings show how the conflicts between different translations of social sustainability change the discourse over time without changing the phrasing of the first level of meaning. This finding shows that 1) while the core idea persists different translations lead to different artefactual anchoring, 2) which shows a mismatch between long-term socioeconomic goals and short-term financial goals for social sustainability, and 3) risks the concept being hijacked
Boundary (topology · Boundary object · Civil engineering · Economic geography · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Social science · Social sustainability · Sociology · Sustainability · Urban planning · Urban Sustainability · Ecology · Engineering · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Public Policy and Administration Research · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Social sustainability
Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries
The politics of environmental discourse
The politics of boundary objects
Increasing Income Inequality in the Nordics
Spanning Boundaries Between Policy and Practice
Integration
Artefactual anchoring’ of strategic spatial planning as persuasive storytelling
The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning
What do you mean by values? Integration of social with biophysical knowledge in the development of a landscape decision support system
Strengthening the ‘social’ in sustainable development
Organizing matters
Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
Sustainable for whom? Green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the Atlanta Beltline
You keep using that word
Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept
Knowledge use analysis as a way to understand planning conflicts. Two cases from Gothenburg, Sweden
Understanding strategic spatial planning to effectively guide development of urban regions
Livability for whom
Ecosystem restoration as a boundary object, demonstrated in a large-scale landscape restoration project in the Dovre Mountains, Norway
Enacting governance through strategy
A framework to explain the role of boundary objects in sustainability transitions
The social dimension of sustainable development
Green transformation is a boundary object
Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience
Apocalypse Forever
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |