Right to food, right to mine? Competing human rights claims in Bangladesh
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8944409 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Heather P Bedi (0000-0002-1803-9267, Dickinson College, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 59 |
| Páginas | 248-257 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-09-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.015 |
| OpenAlex | W2049673666 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
The right to food is increasingly evoked by a range of actors, but there is not sufficient critical analysis of distinct interpretations of what this right means in practice. Through examination of a mineral extraction project with agricultural implications, this article explores diverse human rights narratives and illuminates associated corporate efforts to minimize recognition of food as a fundamental right. A British mining company proposes the Phulbari open pit coal mine in an agriculturally important region of Bangladesh. Highly contested by affected populations, clashes in 2006 between the police and protestors turned deadly in the area. In February 2012, a group of UN Special Rapporteurs cautioned the Government of Bangladesh regarding human rights violations associated with the planned mine. They warned that the project would displace hundreds of thousands of people, while destroying fertile agricultural land. In contrast, an ongoing publicity campaign by the corporation attempts to promote their intervention as a positive step, fully compliant with international human rights and corporate social responsibility standards. Taking this case as an exemplar, the article illuminates the pursuit of mining profit and the distinct use of human rights narratives by corporations and UN Special Rapporteurs. These diverse actors represent the layering of voices weighing in on mineral extraction and associated right to food concerns. Collectively, these layered narratives represent a new terrain for the promotion and contestation of mining and highlight the need to scrutinize mining practices in light of social responsibility and human rights claims being voluntary and self-regulated
Agriculture · Corporate social responsibility · Corporation · Food security · Human rights · Narrative · Political science · Public relations · Publicity · Right to food · Sociology · Ecology · Human Rights and Development · Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact · Law · Mining and Resource Management
Our energy, our rights’
Mining, rural livelihoods and food security
Who owns the right to food? Interlegality and competing interests in agricultural modernisation in Papua, Indonesia
The techno-politics of human rights
Women and development-forced evictions
The regional identity politics of India's new land wars
Mines and signs
Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry
Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community"
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Spaces of Global Capitalism
The New Extraction
Special Economic Zones
Food security
Working the Spaces of Neoliberalism
The intersection of corporate social responsibility guidelines and indigenous rights
Musings of a UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights
Progressive Geopolitics
Risks and Reconstruction
A to Z of Abuses
The Indian State in a Liberalizing Landscape
Environmental Mis-Assessment, Development and Mining in Orissa, India
Contention and Ambiguity
The Struggle for Corporate Accountability
Resource Wars
Power, Property Rights and the Issue of Land Reform
Food sovereignty
Land grabs and primitive accumulation in deltaic Bangladesh
Land expropriation and displacement in Bangladesh
The Human Rights Framework in Contemporary Agrarian Struggles
How not to think of land-grabbing
Food crises, food regimes and food movements
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,7 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2023 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |