Persuasion without policies
The work of reviving Indigenous peoples’ fire management in southern Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8944548 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Will Smith (0000-0003-1913-6963, Deakin University, corresponding author), T Neale (0000-0003-4703-5801, Deakin University), Jessica K Weir (0000-0003-0078-520X, Australian National University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 120 |
| Pages | 82-92 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.015 |
| OpenAlex | W3128445569 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 39 |
Catastrophic and unprecedented wildfires have unfolded across fire-prone landscapes globally over the last three years, with highly publicized loss of human life, property destruction and ecological transformation. Indigenous peoples within many nations have persuasively argued that traditional fire management can enhance existing wildfire mitigation strategies. However, there are considerable barriers to the further incorporation of Indigenous practices into existing wildfire policy. This paper explores the potential of Indigenous fire management to achieve broader institutionalization, emphasizing the social labour involved producing and sustaining intercultural collaboration in bureaucratic contexts. Our focus is southern Australia where Indigenous peoples' fire management, often termed 'cultural burning', has been facilitated by an Indigenous-led social movement and growing state support. We draw on interviews conducted with Aboriginal and white land and hazard management practitioners actively engaged in intercultural fire management collaborations largely occurring on public lands. In the absence of institutional clarity, established networks and accreted experience these practitioners work to generate enthusiasm, stabilise Aboriginal peoples' environmental authority and nullify pervasive societal fears surrounding the risk of fire. The case study demonstrates the significance of interpersonal factors in the emergence and maintenance of fraught intercultural collaborations. Despite global optimism, such insights highlight how the revival of Indigenous fire management in nations such as Australia is highly contingent and depends upon routine persuasive labour and fragile intercultural diplomacy
Indigenous · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Disaster Management and Resilience · Ecology · Fire effects on ecosystems
Expert knowledge, collaborative concepts, and universal nature
Ethical and inclusive challenges of integrating AI and indigenous knowledge systems
Indigenous peoples’ cultural burning within a government fire agency? The state craft and agenda stakes in public sector land management
The politics and co-production of knowledge in Indigenous wildfire management
Operationalising Indigenous data sovereignty in environmental research and governance
Integrated fire management in a tropical biosphere reserve
Firing the imagination? A visual analysis of bushfire preparedness videos from Australian fire agencies, 2015–2022
Engaging Indigenous Peoples and local communities in global policy development for the conservation and sustainable use of wild food plants
From Firestick to Satellites
Fire governance research in the tropics
What's Wrong with Stereotyping
Biyani Guwiyang Dharug Ngurrawa
Indigenous Fire Futures
Emergent sovereignties
Bridging equity and resilience
Altadena Is Not for Sale”
A flexible framework for cost-effective fire management
Aboriginal fire-management practices in colonial Victoria
A hima traditional ecological knowledge perspective of the sustainability goals in AlUla’s journey through time masterplan
Contesting empire religion
Wildfire bureaucracy
If there is no support, we won’t advance”
Tomorrow's Country
Cultural Burning as Resistance to Colonisation
Forging Preferred Landscapes
What Tradition Affords
Neoliberal Indigenous Policy
Country, Native Title and Ecology
Evolution of co-management
“Na whenua, na Tuhoe. Ko D.o.C. te partner”—Prospects for Comanagement of Te Urewera National Park
Neoliberal Indigenous Policy
The Biggest Estate on Earth
Do Burning Practices Contribute to Caring for Country? Contemporary Uses of Fire for Conservation Purposes in Indigenous Australia
Cross-Cultural Monitoring of a Cultural Keystone Species Informs Revival of Indigenous Burning of Country in South-Eastern Australia
Waging Paperfare
Reevaluating the Co-management Success Story
The natural hazard sector's engagement with Indigenous peoples
Arctic ontologies
Indigenous fire ecologies, restoration, and territorial sovereignty in the Brazilian Cerrado
The Politics of Fire and the Social Impacts of Fire Exclusion on the Klamath1
Who Shapes the Politics of Expertise? Co‐Production and Authoritative Knowledge in Thailand's Political Forests
Caring for Country, a Form of Bureaucratic Participation. Conservation, Development, and Neoliberalism in Indigenous Australia
New perspectives in fire management in South American savannas
Native enclosures
Compartmentalising Culture
Rethinking the building blocks
C aring as C ountry
Pre-European Fire Regimes in Australian Ecosystems
Bridging knowledge divides
Innovation in Management Plans for Community Conserved Areas
Protocols, particularities, and problematising Indigenous 'engagement' in community-based environmental management in settled Australia
They could take you out for coffee and call it consultation
Rooted in Place? The Coproduction of Knowledge and Space in Agroforestry Assemblages
The social effects of native title
Walking together
Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique
Unlikely Alliances
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |