Meat politics. Analysing actors, strategies and power relations governing the meat regime in Austria
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8944784 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charlotte Voigt (0009-0007-2468-4805, BOKU University, corresponding author), L Hundscheid (0000-0003-2032-3045, BOKU University), Christina Plank (0000-0003-2236-1512, BOKU University), Melanie Pichler (0000-0001-6224-1609, BOKU University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 154 |
| Pages | 104048-104048 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104048 |
| OpenAlex | W4399702711 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 42 |
The paper examines the politics of reducing meat production and consumption. • It uses food regime and critical state theory to analyze meat politics in Austria. • Incumbent actors drive the meat regime towards national production and consumption. • Alternative ways of production and consumption favor strong political regulations. • Retail sector vertically integrates producers and consumers increasing its power. Meat consumption is increasingly discussed as a key lever for reducing environmental and human health impacts within food systems. As in many high-income countries, meat consumption in Austria exceeds dietary and planetary-health recommendations. If, and how, to address overconsumption has become a site of political conflict. Calls for political measures toward sustainable dietary transitions make it important to consider the political economy of meat consumption and production in national contexts. It is thus important to understand the surrounding structures, institutions, and power relations. Using a theoretical approach grounded in food regime theory and critical state analysis, we shed light on important actors and power relations concerning meat production and consumption in Austria. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and documents, we identify three political projects competing for influence. A strong production driven project pushes to establish a regime of national consumption rather than addressing excessive production and consumption. A civil society driven project is gaining ground in challenging dominant forms of accumulation. In a third project, national producers and alternative production pathways are subject to an increasingly powerful corporate retail sector, which advances economic and increasingly ecologically oriented rationalization to increase profits. Strategies to challenge this corporate power have so far been sparse. Rather, the reproduction of consumer power and responsibility in the producing sector serves to strengthen this development as food retailers can effectively position themselves as custodians of the consumer. Active policies and willingness to accept the necessity for changing consumption are required to redistribute power
Business · Economic system · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture
Understanding power in food policy
Interweaving systems, embedding practices
A restatement of the protein transition
Conceptualizing supply- and demand-side climate change mitigation
The EU’s Farm to Fork Strategy
A license to eat meat? Exploring processes underlying the effect of animal labels on meat consumption
Community-supported agriculture in Czechia
State politics and food alternatives in the post-socialist food regime in Czechia
From Colonialism to Green Capitalism
Power
Food in the Anthropocene
Analyzing values-based modes of production and consumption
Das Experteninterview — konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage
Public policies and vested interests preserve the animal farming status quo at the expense of animal product analogs
Contours of historical-materialist policy analysis
Does it change the nature of food and capitalism?” Exploring expert perspectives on public policies for a transition to ‘less and better’ meat and dairy
What’s really at ‘steak’? Understanding the global politics of red and processed meat reduction
From “Food from Nowhere” to “Food from Here
Breaking new ground in food regime theory
Redefining power relations in agrifood systems
New food regime geographies
Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria—Part I
Biomass from somewhere?” Governing the spatial mismatch of Viennese biomass consumption and its impact on biodiversity
Negotiating between forest conversion, industrial tree plantations and multifunctional landscapes. Power and politics in forest transitions
Food sovereignty and the integral state
Agriculture, food and land
Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition
Policy mix for the sustainable protein transition in Austria - Addressing repercussions of regime shifts as a prerequisite for acceleration
Destabilizing the food regime “from within
From the imperial to the empty calorie
Food Regimes, Capital, State, and Class
Agriculture and the State System
Legal Dispossession
When food regimes become hegemonic
The Transformation of the Spanish Livestock System in the Second and Third Food Regimes
Stepping back and moving in
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |