A very public cull – The anatomy of an online issue public

Bibliographic Data

ID8945944
AuthorsRebecca Sandover (0000-0002-8495-5423, University of Exeter, corresponding author), Samuel Kinsley (0000-0002-1336-292X, University of Exeter), Steve Hinchliffe (0000-0002-0698-8924, University of Exeter), Stephen Hinchliffe
Year2018
Volume97
Pages106-118
Publication date2018-10-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeoforum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.016
OpenAlexW2898796606
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited47

Geographers and other social scientists have for some time been interested in how scientific and environmental controversies emerge and become public or collective issues. Social media are now key platforms through which these issues are publically raised and through which groups or publics can organise themselves. As media that generate data and traces of networking activity, these platforms also provide an opportunity for scholars to study the character and constitution of those groupings. In this paper we lay out a method for studying these ‘issue publics’: emergent groupings involved in publicising an issue. We focus on the controversy surrounding the state-sanctioned cull of wild badgers in England as a contested means of disease management in cattle. We analyse two overlapping groupings to demonstrate how online issue publics function in a variety of ways – from the ‘echo chambers’ of online sharing of information, to the marshalling of agreements on strategies for action, to more dialogic patterns of debate. We demonstrate the ways in which digital media platforms are themselves performative in the formation of issue publics and that, while this creates issues, we should not retreat into debates around the ‘proper object’ of research but rather engage with the productive complications of mapping social media data into knowledge (Whatmore, 2009). In turn, we argue that online issue publics are not homogeneous and that the lines of heterogeneity are neither simple or to be expected and merit study as a means to understand the suite of processes and novel contexts involved in the emergence of a public

Biology · Dialogic · Epistemology · Function (biology · License · Object (grammar · Ostensive definition · Performative utterance · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Social media · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Law · Social Media and Politics · Wikis in Education and Collaboration

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access