Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Re-Evaluating Herrera's Sonnet XXXVIII

"Notes on Sense and Intellect in the Lyric Persona of "Algunas obras

Bibliographic Data

ID8955439
AuthorsAlexander John Mcnair (0000-0001-8413-3967, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume71
Issue4
Pages565-565
Publication date2003-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHispanic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2176 • E-ISSN: 1553-0639
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3247022
OpenAlexW2062474093
LanguageEN
References cited4

The purpose of this study is to question some received ideas about sonnet XXXVIII (Serena Luz, en quien presente espira) of Fernando de 1582 collection Alqunas obras, and in turn to question some common preconceptions about the collection itself. Sonnet XXXVIII is usually cited as an exemplary contemplation of the divine in the mortal beauty of the beloved-de adorar a Dios por medio de su amada (Garcia xvi)-or as evidence of ability to transcend matter in search of the Neoplatonic ideal, to alcanzar cima del extasis en su denodada busqueda de belleza divina (Vilanova 727). Frequently citing only the poem's final tercet, literary critics and historians claim that the lady's beauty fulfills a redemptive role (Maglione 52), leading some to generalize that Herrera jamas evoca mas delcitcs que los del espiritu . . . su platonismo se inclina hacia lo mistico, aspirando a union espiritual (Romera Navarro 159), and that Por amor a Poesia y no precisamente a mujer Herrera empieza a cantarla. Una y otra se confunden en aspiracion platonica a Belleza (Celaya 25). For most critics and literary historians, though, Herrera's poetry has little thematic originality (Jones 96), while his erudition and technical perfection give the impression of a cold, astute, and overly urbane poet (Stamm 91), reflecting a primarily literary experience within an aristocratic, scholarly setting (Rivers 20). The poet/critic Gabriel Celaya refers to poetry in general as la aspiracion de un nombre entregado a mistica laica del intelectualismo platonico (26) and to his platonic love as a convencion aceptada, juego de sociedad y juego poetico (31). These generalizations and preconceptions have led one critic to state, unfortunately, that Herrera understood everything about poetry except how to do (Bianchini 65). Returning to Sonnet XXXVIII, then, most readers will naturally find a poet seeking divinity in mortal beauty, perhaps following Pietro Bembo's prescriptions for the ideal courtier-lover (as related by Castiglione), simply an empty exercise of the intellect. Even those critics who have recognized the inaccuracy of these generalizations when applied to whole collection, continue to refer to sonnet XXXVIII as an example of the poet's conventional Neoplatonism (Lopez Bueno 51; McGinnis 154).My contention in the analysis that follows is not that these are necessarily misconceptions about sonnet XXXVIII. The sonnet does indeed reveal a lyric persona aspiring to spiritual purification in addition Lo a poet aspiring Lo stylislic perfection. Rather than misconceptions, I would argue that they are insistent preconceptions that seem to have discouraged stronger readings not only of this sonnet but of much of el Divino's poetry, ironically at a time when post-structuralist approaches to early-modern poetry have reinvigorated our readings of other poets. Indeed, valuable studies have been written on subjectivity and in Garcilaso, Gongora, and Quevedo-from a variety of theoretical perspectives (see, for example, Cascardi, Gaylord, and Mariscal respectively)-while criticism on Herrera has shifted its attention almost entirely away from his poetry in the last twenty-five years, preferring instead to analyze his monumental prose Anotaciones of Garcilaso (1580). This shift is due in part to the perception that verses are coldly intellectual, with a technical precision that conveys the poetic object more vividly to the reader as it weakens our sense of the poet as an individual, speaking voice (Smith 63). This study, however, will demonstrate that when we read sonnet XXXVIII closely in the context of the collection in which it appears, attentive to what and how it says what it says, a much more nuanced poetic emerges, a lyric persona that encompasses the sensual as well as the intellectual. By design, Herrera allows a sensual individual to slip through the cracks in the discursive surface of his consciously (coldly

Art · Humanities · Intellect · Literature · Persona · Poetry · Sonnet · Theology · Early Modern Spanish Literature · Historical Art and Architecture Studies · Philosophy · Spanish Literature and Culture Studies

  • The Icy Fire

    Leonard Forster, Geoffrey Stagg•Renaissance and Reformation•1969

  • Garcilaso's Sonnet XXIII

    Edward F Stanton•Hispanic Review•1972

  • Las Anotaciones de Herrera y las formas estilisticas de la tradicion hermogeneana

    Ángel Luis Luján Atienza•Hispanic Review•2000

  • Garcilaso de la Vega y sus comentaristas

    Augusta M Espantoso-Foley, Augusta Espantoso-Foley et al.•Hispanic Review•1970

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae