Contested Legitimacy and the Ambiguous Rise of Vestries in Early Modern London
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8956774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J F Merritt (0000-0003-1780-7866, University of Nottingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-45 |
| Publication date | 2011-01-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x10000555 |
| OpenAlex | W2107186823 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
Studies of the rise of London's vestries in the period to 1640 have tended to discuss them in terms of the inexorable rise of oligarchy and state formation. This article re-examines the emergence of the vestries in several ways, moving beyond this traditional focus on oligarchy, and noting how London's vestries raised much broader issues concerning law, custom, and lay religious authority. The article reveals a notable contrast between the widespread influence and activities of London vestries and the questionable legal framework in which they operated. The political and ecclesiastical authorities – and in particular Archbishop Laud – are also shown to have had very mixed attitudes towards the legitimacy and desirability of powerful vestries. The apparently smooth and relentless spread of select vestries in the pre-war period is also shown to be illusory. The granting of vestry ‘faculties’ by the authorities ceased abruptly at the end of the 1620s, amid a series of serious legal challenges, on both local and ideological grounds, to the existence of vestries. Their rise had thus been seriously contested and stymied well before the upheavals of the 1640s, although opposition to them came from multiple sources – Laudians, Henry Spelman and the royal Commission on Fees, and local parishioners – whose objectives could vary
Aesthetics · Archbishop · Democracy · Economic history · Enthusiasm · Ideology · Legitimacy · Oligarchy · Opposition (politics · Period (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Classics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Scottish History and National Identity
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |