Charles I, Clement Coke, and Sedition

Bibliographic Data

ID8957101
AuthorsMichael B Young (Illinois Wesleyan University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume59
Issue3
Pages669-693
Publication date2015-12-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x15000308
OpenAlexW2268106801
LanguageEN
References cited15

Clement Coke was a minor figure of the early Stuart period, especially in comparison to his brilliant and prominent father, Sir Edward Coke. People seem to have taken note of ‘Fighting Clem’ only when he engaged in a duel or punched another member of parliament. In the parliament of 1626, however, he briefly gained notoriety when he faced an unusually formidable adversary, Charles I, who accused him of making a seditious speech. A close analysis of this episode reveals much about the broad concept of sedition and the unstable atmosphere in the House of Commons. Coke's case also had repercussions later in this parliament and perhaps even in the next parliament where his father championed the Petition of Right. Yet the most interesting aspect of Coke's case is what it reveals about the mindset of the king. In contrast to the stereotypical view of Charles as prickly and paranoid, he appears here to have been both perceptive and prescient. Thus, this article, like work by the late Mark Kishlansky, concludes that we should take Charles I's view of the political landscape more seriously

Commons · Epistemology · House of Commons · Mindset · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sedition · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Scottish History and National Identity

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub