Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Struggle for London in the Second Civil War

Bibliographic Data

ID8957253
AuthorsIan Gentles (York University, corresponding author)
Year1983
Volume26
Issue2
Pages277-305
Publication date1983-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00024079
OpenAlexW2134735635
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited4

According to a familiar interpretation, London was parliamentarian in the English Revolution, and was instrumental in the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the English republic which endured for eleven years. London was the arsenal, the treasure–house and the recruiting ground for the revolutionary cause; it was the Paris of the English Revolution. In this article I shall argue that from early 1646 – a year after the formation of the New Model Army – London was deeply divided between those who wanted the terms agreed by the Houses to be imposed on Charles rather than negotiated with him, and those who wanted a speedy end to the war, a mutually agreed peace, the disbandment of the army and the imposition of religious uniformity. By 1647 the rulers of London were dominated by an implacable hatred of the revolutionary army, and bent their efforts to restoring Charles to his throne. In this policy they enjoyed the warm support of a majority of the City's population, who repeatedly demonstrated their anti-revolutionary convictions. in both word and deed. The army's political support in London was drawn mainly from the artisan and tradesman classes (many of them non-citizens), and from the suburbs. To a large extent it was the assiduous efforts of one man – Philip Skippon, major-general of the New Model infantry – which kept London in the parliamentary camp during the second civil war

Ancient history · Battle · Deed · English Revolution · Hatred · Infantry · Interpretation (philosophy · Interregnum · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Population · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Throne · Treasure · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Demography · History · Law · Philosophy

  • The problem of ‘popular political culture’ in seventeenth-century London

    Tim Harris•History of European Ideas•1989

  • The wall and glory of Jerusalem’

    Elliot Vernon•The Seventeenth Century•2023

  • The King, the Parliament, and the Localities during the English Civil War

    Open Access•Ann Hughes•Journal of British Studies•1985

  • King of the Sea’

    Open Access•Sean Kelsey•History•2007

  • Essex and the King's Cause in 1648

    Open Access•Brian Lyndon•The Historical Journal•1986

  • Popular Politics and Public Policy

    Open Access•Michael J Braddick•The Historical Journal•1991

  • The Bawdy House Riots of 1668

    Open Access•Tim Harris•The Historical Journal•1986

  • Presbyterianism in the City of London, 1645–1647

    Open Access•Michael Mahony•The Historical Journal•1979

  • England in the Seventeenth Century

    C H Firth, G N Clark•The Economic History Review•1935

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,17
Citation span1985 - 2023 (39)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae