II. Matthew Boulton and the Art of Parliamentary Lobbying
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8957763 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eric Robinson (0000-0003-3586-5533, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 209-229 |
| Publication date | 1964-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00025437 |
| OpenAlex | W1995834786 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 5 |
The granting of an extension to James Watt's patent for an improved steamengine (or fire-engine as it was then called) might be considered the most important single event in the Industrial Revolution. Its implications have been fully debated. Some have argued that without it Watt's steam engine might never have been perfected and that consequently the steam revolution might have been delayed; others have said that it proved a block to progress, and in particular hindered the work of Trevithick and others who appreciated the importance of high-pressure steam. Whichever view one takes of it, it is a crucial event in the history of steam power, and therefore it is important to understand fully the circumstances in which it came about, so that we can assess the motives of those who promoted the measure and those who opposed it. And when we consider that the opposition to it was led by Edmund Burke himself, an added interest is given to the matter, for we may expect to learn something of Burke's attitudes to monopolies and patents. Lastly, the material on which this paper is based has a further interest. It gives a detailed account of a parliamentary lobby in the later eighteenth century, giving the names of those who were approached, and allowing us to see the methods which were pursued by an eminent manufacturer, Matthew Boulton, and his partner, James Watt, in getting such a measure through Parliament. As is so often the case during the early years of the Industrial Revolution what appears at first sight to be a local affair proves to be a matter of national, even international importance, in its repercussions. The history of Birmingham becomes the history of the world
Economics · Event (particle physics · Law and economics · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Steam engine · Watt · Engineering · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law
Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke's Political Economy
Success and failure in England's patent system
Geographies of steam
Peers, Patronage, and the Industrial Revolution, 1760-1800
The Calthorpe Family and Birmingham, 1810–1910
Le bureau d'essai de Birmingham, ou la fabrique de la réputation au XVIIIesiècle
| Citations per year | 0.12 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1975 - 2026 (52) |
| Highly cited | No |