Women and the History of Samuel Pepys's Diary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8957942 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kate Loveman (0000-0002-2552-0825, University of Leicester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1221-1243 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x21000716 |
| OpenAlex | W4280593860 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Through focusing on the lives of women, this article examines silences and obfuscations in Samuel Pepys's diary and in the histories we tell about this most famous of Restoration sources. It begins by considering how the ways we read the diary today remain influenced by Pepys's decisions when preserving his papers. While his diary has increasingly been studied for what it reveals about early modern sex and/or women's lives, historians have faced difficulties in assessing and representing this content, partly because of measures devised by Pepys. Knowledge of his methods, together with close reading, can help us attend to what this source omits and elides. Historiography has often followed Pepys's lead when discussing his diary's sexual content, and it has also followed his lead in researching his kin. His father's family has been tracked over generations; meanwhile, basic facts about his mother and her family have remained unknown. The article traces Pepys's maternal kin, comparing new evidence with the diary's representation of social status and kinship networks. Pepys's diary is a vital source on the seventeenth century, but fully exploiting that source requires factoring in Pepys's methods of writing and preservation, and attending to what has gone unwritten
Art · Genealogy · Historiography · Kinship · Literature · Political science · Politics · Reading (process · Representation (politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Anthropology · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |