Arguing About Intervention

This article compares the rhetorical justifications surrounding two landmark instances of Western imperialism. In 1882, the British occupied Egypt, ousting indigenous proto-nationalist forces that supposedly threatened British and other foreign interests. The consequences of this intervention were still being worked out in 1956 when, in the wake of the Cairo regime's nationalization of the Suez Canal, the British again invaded. France participated on this occasion, with serious but differing political consequences for both. We suggest that comparing how the British and French argued about these issues, and also examining how the rhetoric of the later crisis contrasted with the earlier one, offers useful insights into the two nations' respective imperial cultures. Specifically, we suggest that the latter-day imperialists Anthony Eden and Guy Mollet couched their actions in internationalist rhetoric reminiscent both of the Gladstone government's justifications for intervention in 1882 and of French official explanations for their takeover in Tunisia a year earlier. Each claimed their actions were taken both to uphold better standards of governance and to restore regional order, itself a highly loaded concept. The language of imperial domination was eschewed; but the ends of empire were served by the use of this rhetoric of ‘liberal order’

Art · Empire · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Intervention (counseling · Literature · Nationalism · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · History · Law · Legal and cultural studies analysis · Philosophy

• Recent Articles on French History

  Jean‐pierre V M Herubel, Jean-Pierre Hérubel•French Historical Studies•2022

  Incluir item

• Identity Politics and Political Perception in the European Settlement of Tunisia

  Mark I Choate•French Colonial History•2007

  Incluir item

• Sir Charles Dilke and the British Intervention In Egypt, 1882

  Open Access•Muriel E Chamberlain•British Journal of International…•1976

  Incluir item

• The Press and the Suez Crisis

  Open Access•Ralph Negrine•The Historical Journal•1982

  Incluir item

• The British Press in the Suez Crisis

  Open Access•Guillaume Parmentier•The Historical Journal•1980

  Incluir item

• Prestige, Prudence and Public Opinion in the 1882 British Occupation of Egypt

  Open Access•Dan Halvorson•Australian Journal of Politics &…•2010

  Incluir item

• Empire and the Languages of Character and Virtue in Later Victorian and Edwardian Britain

  Open Access•Peter Cain•Modern Intellectual History•2007

  Incluir item

• The cabinet system and management of the Suez Crisis

  Christopher Brady•Contemporary British History•1997

  Incluir item

• A ‘Political Education’

  Luisa Villa•Journal of Victorian Culture•2012

  Incluir item

• Great Britain's ‘Last Battle’ in the Middle East

  Howard J Dooley•The International History Review•1989

  Incluir item

• A two‐edged sword

  Peter J Durrans•The Journal of Imperial &…•1982

  Incluir item

• Character and imperialism

  P J Cain, Peter Cain•The Journal of Imperial &…•2006

  Incluir item

• The Alexandria massacre of 11 June 1882 and the British occupation of Egypt

  Muriel E Chamberlain•Middle Eastern Studies•1977

  Incluir item

• Suez revisited

  Anthony Adamthwaite•International Affairs•1988

  Incluir item

• Imperialism and the Victorians

  J Darwin•The English Historical Review•1997

  Incluir item

• The Suez Company's Concession in Egypt, 1854–1956

  Open Access•Caroline Piquet•Enterprise & Society•2004

  Incluir item

• The French Colonialist Movement during the Third Republic

  Open Access•Caroline Andrews, C M Andrew•Transactions of the Royal…•1976

  Incluir item

• The Victorians and Africa

  Open Access•A G Hopkins•The Journal of African History•1986

  Incluir item

• The British Occupation of Egypt

  Open Access•John S Galbraith, Afaf Lutfi Al-Sayyid-Marsot•International Journal Middle East…•1978

  Incluir item

• Colonial Bridgehead

  Open Access•Michael J Reimer•International Journal Middle East…•1988

  Incluir item

• V. The French ‘Colonial Party’

  Open Access•Caroline Andrews, C M Andrew et al.•The Historical Journal•1971

  Incluir item

• Republicanism, Railway Imperialism, and the French Empire in Africa, 1879–1889

  Open Access•TREVOR WYN ROBERTS•The Historical Journal•2011

  Incluir item

• The ‘Men on the Spot’ and the English Occupation of Egypt in 1882

  Open Access•Alexander Schölch•The Historical Journal•1976

  Incluir item

• Suez and Britain's Decline as a World Power

  Open Access•G C Peden•The Historical Journal•2012

  Incluir item

• France's Extraordinary Ambassador

  Bruce Fulton•French Historical Studies•2000

  Incluir item

• The Failure of Gambetta's Grand Ministere

  Stephen Ashley, S A Ashley•French Historical Studies•1975

  Incluir item

• Nature and Nurture in French Ethnography and Anthropology, 1859-1914

  Martin S Staum•Journal of the History of Ideas•2004

  Incluir item

• Entre velléité et opiniâtreté

  Julie D''Andurain, Julie D'Andurain•French Colonial History•2013

  Incluir item

• What Is Liberalism

  Open Access•Duncan Bell•Political Theory•2014

  Incluir item

• Empire and Legal Universalisms in the Eighteenth Century

  J Pitts•The American Historical Review•2012

  Incluir item

• The "Theoretical Revolution" in Intellectual History

  Open Access•Elias Palti, Elías José Palti•History and Theory•2014

  Incluir item

• Beyond Comparison

  Open Access•Michaël Werner, B Zimmermann•History and Theory•2006

  Incluir item

• Geographies of Power

  Mary Dewhurst Lewis•The Journal of Modern History•2008

  Incluir item

• Le Matin, les affaires et la politique, 1884-1897

  Dominique Pinsolle, Dominique Pinsolle Dominique Pinsolle•Le Mouvement social•2010

  Incluir item

• Liberal imperialism and the occupation of Egypt in 1882

  Open Access•John Newsinger•Race & Class•2008

  Incluir item