Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stratford, the Cabinet and the Outbreak of the Crimean War

Bibliographic Data

ID8958196
AuthorsJohn Herkless (University of Birmingham, corresponding author), J L Herkless
Year1975
Volume18
Issue3
Pages497-523
Publication date1975-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00008426
OpenAlexW1964585759
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited8

The Eastern Question is a hardy perennial in historical research and writing. Years, indeed generations, of study seem to leave basic issues unresolved. One of the most persistent of those issues is the role of Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, the British ambassador at Constantinople, in the outbreak of the Crimean War. Temperley may have been exaggerating when he said it had long been a popular belief that Stratford ‘was the human agency which caused the Crimean War’ – a belief he spent some time in efforts to dispel – but that Stratford was less than helpful in the pursuit of a peaceful solution to the 1853 crisis was certainly a widely held belief at the time and has proved an enduring one. As late as 1966, M. S. Anderson, dealing with the question of Stratford's ‘guilt’, once more could only conclude: ‘Whether Stratford de Redcliffe, as has often been alleged, privately urged the Turkish ministers to reject the [Vienna] Note while publicly advising them to accept it, is uncertain.’ The Vienna Note was the settlement of the Russo-Turkish conflict proposed jointly by the Governments of England, France, Austria and Prussia and accepted in toto by the Tsar. There was, however, no lack of certainty in the minds of the British foreign secretary at the time, Lord Clarendon, and the first lord of the admiralty, Sir James Graham, that Stratford had been an agent provocateur. On 3 September Greville wrote: ‘Clarendon thinks that Stratford has encouraged the resistance of the Divan to the proposals [at Vienna] and that he might have persuaded the Turks to accept the terms if he had chosen to do so...’

Ancient history · Archaeology · Cabinet (room · Certainty · Political science · Settlement (finance · Spanish Civil War · Turkish · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy

  • When Doves Feed Hawks

    Open Access•Ali Balci, Tuncay Kardas et al.•Alternatives Global Local Political•2022

  • The Eastern Question 1774–1923

    Open Access•M S Anderson•The Eastern Question 1774–1923•1966

  • The Greville Memoirs

    Open Access•Charles Cavendish Fulke Greville, Henry Reeve•Greville Memoirs : Volume 1•2011

  • A Century of Diplomatic Blue Books, 1814-1914

    Samuel Flagg Bemis, Harold Temperley et al.•The American Historical Review•1939

  • Stratford de Redcliffe and the Origins of the Crimean War

    Harold Temperley•The English Historical Review•1934

  • The Paris Embassy during the Second Empire

    W G East, F A Wellesley•Economica•1929

  • The Triumph of Lord Palmerston

    B Kingsley Martin, Bessie Martin•Economica•1925

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae