Constitutional Consensus and Puritan Opposition in the 1620s
Thomas Scott and the Spanish Match
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8958246 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Lake (0000-0003-1544-1020, Bedford College, corresponding author), P G Lake |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 805-825 |
| Publication date | 1982-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00021233 |
| OpenAlex | W2165536552 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 10 |
In 1620 Thomas Scott published a notorious pamphlet entitled Vox Populi . This purported to recount the proceedings of the Spanish council of state and denounced the devious machinations of Gondomar, the Spanish ambassador, and by implication the pro-Spanish policy of King James. Once Scott's authorship became known he took the traditional way out and fled to the Low Countries. There he served as a preacher with the English regiments and as a minister at Utrecht. He also continued his pamphlet commentary on events in England. Scott, then, was that well-known figure, the radical puritan opponent of the Jacobean regime. He has certainly been cast in that role and until recently such a view of his career would have seemed unexceptionable enough. However, of late there has emerged a corpus of work which might be thought to render any such view of Scott untenable. On the one hand, the existence within the mainstream of English protestantism of anything approaching a coherent body of puritan attitudes has been challenged, at least until the emergence of Arminianism polarized religious opinion and almost created a self-conscious and aggressive puritanism where there had been none before. In the political sphere it has been claimed that within the predominant view of constitutional and political propriety any attempt at concerted opposition to royal policy was both conceptually and practically impossible
Adversary · Mainstream · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy
Puritanisme et communication politique dans l’Angleterre des années 1620
Harnessing Conscience for the King
Fatal and memorable
History, fiction and political persuasion
A godly friendship
Reformation religious identities and the fluidities of confessional allegiance
Criticizing Kings
The Rhetoric of Providence
The English Puritan Clergy's Acceptance of Political Parties, 1570‐1700
Conformity in Conscience
Protestants and the Irish Language, c. 1675–1725
Sir William Brereton and England's Wars of Religion
The King, the Parliament, and the Localities during the English Civil War
Rumor and “Common Fame”
The Ecclesiastical Policy of King James I
Evil Counsel
Constructing Discord
Publics and Participation
Caroline Culture
Kingship and Counsel in Early Modern England
Opposition to the Personal Rule of Charles I
Covenanter Propaganda and Conceptualizations of the Public During the Bishops' Wars, 1638–1640
The Origins of the English Civil War
The Significance of the Elizabethan Identification of the Pope as Antichrist
A Comment
Parliamentary History in Perspective, 1604–1629
Matthew Hutton–a Puritan Bishop
Captain Thomas Gainsford, the 'Vox Spiritus' and the Vox Populi
The Beleaguered Isle. A Study of Elizabethan and Early Jacobean Anti-Catholicism
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,54 |
| Citation span | 1985 - 2026 (42) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |