Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutional Consensus and Puritan Opposition in the 1620s

Thomas Scott and the Spanish Match

Bibliographic Data

ID8958246
AuthorsPeter Lake (0000-0003-1544-1020, Bedford College, corresponding author), P G Lake
Year1982
Volume25
Issue4
Pages805-825
Publication date1982-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00021233
OpenAlexW2165536552
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited10

In 1620 Thomas Scott published a notorious pamphlet entitled Vox Populi . This purported to recount the proceedings of the Spanish council of state and denounced the devious machinations of Gondomar, the Spanish ambassador, and by implication the pro-Spanish policy of King James. Once Scott's authorship became known he took the traditional way out and fled to the Low Countries. There he served as a preacher with the English regiments and as a minister at Utrecht. He also continued his pamphlet commentary on events in England. Scott, then, was that well-known figure, the radical puritan opponent of the Jacobean regime. He has certainly been cast in that role and until recently such a view of his career would have seemed unexceptionable enough. However, of late there has emerged a corpus of work which might be thought to render any such view of Scott untenable. On the one hand, the existence within the mainstream of English protestantism of anything approaching a coherent body of puritan attitudes has been challenged, at least until the emergence of Arminianism polarized religious opinion and almost created a self-conscious and aggressive puritanism where there had been none before. In the political sphere it has been claimed that within the predominant view of constitutional and political propriety any attempt at concerted opposition to royal policy was both conceptually and practically impossible

Adversary · Mainstream · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy

  • Puritanisme et communication politique dans l’Angleterre des années 1620

    Open Access•Stéphane Haffemayer•Revue française de civilisation…•2022

  • Harnessing Conscience for the King

    Laura Perille•Exemplaria•2012

  • Fatal and memorable

    Kirsty Rolfe•The Seventeenth Century•2020

  • History, fiction and political persuasion

    Open Access•Erzsébet Stróbl•The Seventeenth Century•2026

  • A godly friendship

    Diane Willen•The Seventeenth Century•2019

  • Reformation religious identities and the fluidities of confessional allegiance

    Open Access•Michael Questier•The Seventeenth Century•2025

  • Criticizing Kings

    Open Access•Jamie Gianoutsos•Renaissance Quarterly•2017

  • The Rhetoric of Providence

    Open Access•Christina M Carlson•Renaissance Quarterly•2014

  • The English Puritan Clergy's Acceptance of Political Parties, 1570‐1700

    Open Access•Benjamin H Newcomb•Journal of Religious History•1995

  • Conformity in Conscience

    Open Access•John D Ford•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•1995

  • Protestants and the Irish Language, c. 1675–1725

    Open Access•Toby Barnard, T C Barnard•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•1993

  • Sir William Brereton and England's Wars of Religion

    Open Access•John Morrill•Journal of British Studies•1985

  • The King, the Parliament, and the Localities during the English Civil War

    Open Access•Ann Hughes•Journal of British Studies•1985

  • Rumor and “Common Fame”

    Open Access•David Coast•Journal of British Studies•2016

  • The Ecclesiastical Policy of King James I

    Open Access•Kenneth Fincham, Peter Lake•Journal of British Studies•1985

  • Evil Counsel

    Open Access•Noah Millstone•Journal of British Studies•2011

  • Constructing Discord

    Open Access•Ethan Howard Shagan•Journal of British Studies•1997

  • Publics and Participation

    Open Access•Peter Lake•Journal of British Studies•2017

  • Caroline Culture

    Open Access•Jeffrey Robertson, J C Robertson•History•1990

  • Kingship and Counsel in Early Modern England

    Open Access•Jacqueline Rose•The Historical Journal•2011

  • Opposition to the Personal Rule of Charles I

    Open Access•J W L Fielding, John Fielding•The Historical Journal•1988

  • Covenanter Propaganda and Conceptualizations of the Public During the Bishops' Wars, 1638–1640

    Open Access•Sarah Waurechen•The Historical Journal•2009

  • The Origins of the English Civil War

    Open Access•Conrad Russell•The Origins of the English Civil…•1973

  • The Significance of the Elizabethan Identification of the Pope as Antichrist

    Open Access•Peter Lake•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•1980

  • A Comment

    Open Access•Patrick Collinson•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•1980

  • Parliamentary History in Perspective, 1604–1629

    Open Access•Conrad Russell•History•1976

  • Matthew Hutton–a Puritan Bishop

    Open Access•Peter Lake•History•1979

  • Captain Thomas Gainsford, the 'Vox Spiritus' and the Vox Populi

    Open Access•L Adam, S L ADAMS•Historical Research•1976

  • The Beleaguered Isle. A Study of Elizabethan and Early Jacobean Anti-Catholicism

    Carol Z Wiener•Past & Present•1971

Unique citing works22
Citations per year0,54
Citation span1985 - 2026 (42)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae