Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

III. The No-Popery Movement in Britain in 1828–9

Bibliographic Data

ID8958370
AuthorsG I T Machin (corresponding author)
Year1963
Volume6
Issue2
Pages193-211
Publication date1963-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00001060
OpenAlexW1971336846
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The passage of Catholic emancipation in April 1829 was resisted, in the name of the inviolability of the Protestant Constitution, by a group of ‘ultra’ anti-catholics.1 The principles and personnel of this group have already been well described, 2 but its political activities have been inadequately explored. Since 1824, when they criticized Lord Liverpool's Government for dilatoriness in prosecuting O’Connell's Catholic Association, these ultras had tended to form a distinct group on the right wing of the anti-catholic Tories, and had been the most aggressive opponents of Canning's short-lived ministry in 1827. The emergence of an Irish demand for Catholic emancipation, of unprecedented force, was shown in O’Connell's victory at the County Clare by-election in July 1828 and in the ensuing months. This produced a determined resistance by the Irish anti-catholics, which had its counterpart in a British no-popery movement led by the ultras. Most of the leading ultras were peers, and the most prominent among them were the dukes of Cumberland and Newcastle, the marquess of Chandos, the earl of Winchilsea and Lords Colchester and Kenyon. For nine months before the passage of the relief bill they sought to counteract the immense fervour of the Irish Catholics by stimulating the ingrained anti-catholic feelings which had characterized the English masses since the sixteenth century. Their efforts, however, were of no avail against Wellington's decision to carry a Government emancipation measure. It is the object of this study to investigate the no-popery movement and to account for its failure

Christian ministry · Economic history · Emancipation · Irish · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Victory · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Irish and British Studies · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies

  • The Movement of Satirical Prints between London and Dublin in the Late 1820s

    Carly Hegenbarth•Visual Culture in Britain•2019

  • Thirty years’ work in Irish history (III)

    Open Access•Helen F Mulvey•Irish Historical Studies•1970

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.04
Citation span1970 - 2019 (50)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae