Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

IV. The Civil List in Eighteenth-Century British Politics

Parliamentary Supremacy versus the Independence of the Crown

Bibliographic Data

ID8958468
AuthorsEarl A Reitan (Illinois State University, corresponding author)
Year1966
Volume9
Issue3
Pages318-337
Publication date1966-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00026674
OpenAlexW2031797063
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited4

In the constitutional evolution of eighteenth-century Britain a major problem was the resolution of the tensions which arose between the executive powers vested in the Crown and the legislative supremacy of Parliament. Although the seventeenth-century conflicts of Crown and Parliament had settled the question of ultimate supremacy in favour of Parliament, eighteenth-century politics, by common consent, were confined to the level where a balance of power could be seen to operate, in which king, Lords, and Commons exercised agreed functions and powers and where the ultimate weapon—parliamentary supremacy—need not be used. The independence of the Crown—however it may have operated in practice—was a cardinal doctrine of the ‘mixed and balanced’ constitution. Although this doctrine was usually invoked to support the right of the king to choose his own ministers, it gave an important constitutional role to the Civil List, for by supplying the Crown with a financial provision not subject to parliamentary control the Civil List served the pur-pose of supporting the independence and the ‘influence’ of the Crown. The uncontrolled expenditure of the Civil List, with its large number of attractive places, pensions, and other benefits, was an important part of that ‘influence’ which some considered necessary for the effective exercise of executive power and which others decried as a threat to the independence of Parliament. The disputes and jealousies created by the Civil List developed in the reigns of George I and George II and came to a climax in the reign of George III. The result was an alteration of the constitutional foundation of the Civil List which further weakened the doctrine of the independence of the Crown and which marked an important step in the evolution of parliamentary government

Constitution · Doctrine · Elite · Independence (probability theory · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Separation of powers · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

  • Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke's Political Economy

    Open Access•Gregory M Collins•Commerce and Manners in Edmund…•2020

  • Parliamentarism

    Open Access•William Selinger•Parliamentarism•2019

  • The Losing of the Initiative by the House of Commons, 1780–1914

    Open Access•Valerie Cromwell•Transactions of the Royal…•1968

  • Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation

    Open Access•Bruce Morrison•World Politics•2011

  • Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe’s Military Revolution

    Gary W Cox, Mark Dincecco et al.•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • The Duke of Newcastle and the Financing of the Seven Years’ War

    Open Access•Reed Browning•The Journal of Economic History•1971

  • Princely Debt, Public Credit, and Commercial Values in Late Georgian Britain

    Open Access•Marilyn Morris•Journal of British Studies•2004

  • Ceremony and Politics

    Open Access•William M Kuhn•Journal of British Studies•1987

  • Architect-Builders in London and Edinburgh, C. 1750–1800, and the Market for Expertise

    Open Access•Stana Nenadic•The Historical Journal•2012

  • Queen Victoria's civil list

    Open Access•William M Kuhn•The Historical Journal•1993

  • Reynolds's Newspaper, Opposition to Monarchy and the Radical Anti-Jubilee

    Open Access•Antony Taylor•Historical Research•1995

  • The correspondence of Edmund Burke

    Edmund Burke•The correspondence of Edmund Burke•1958

  • Leicester House Politics, 1748–1751

    A N Newman, Aubrey Newman•The English Historical Review•1961

  • George III, Lord North and the People, 1779-80

    Elliot Perkins, H Butterfield•The William and Mary Quarterly•1951

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,19
Citation span1968 - 2024 (57)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae