IV. The Civil List in Eighteenth-Century British Politics
Parliamentary Supremacy versus the Independence of the Crown
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8958468 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Earl A Reitan (Illinois State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 318-337 |
| Publication date | 1966-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00026674 |
| OpenAlex | W2031797063 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 4 |
In the constitutional evolution of eighteenth-century Britain a major problem was the resolution of the tensions which arose between the executive powers vested in the Crown and the legislative supremacy of Parliament. Although the seventeenth-century conflicts of Crown and Parliament had settled the question of ultimate supremacy in favour of Parliament, eighteenth-century politics, by common consent, were confined to the level where a balance of power could be seen to operate, in which king, Lords, and Commons exercised agreed functions and powers and where the ultimate weapon—parliamentary supremacy—need not be used. The independence of the Crown—however it may have operated in practice—was a cardinal doctrine of the ‘mixed and balanced’ constitution. Although this doctrine was usually invoked to support the right of the king to choose his own ministers, it gave an important constitutional role to the Civil List, for by supplying the Crown with a financial provision not subject to parliamentary control the Civil List served the pur-pose of supporting the independence and the ‘influence’ of the Crown. The uncontrolled expenditure of the Civil List, with its large number of attractive places, pensions, and other benefits, was an important part of that ‘influence’ which some considered necessary for the effective exercise of executive power and which others decried as a threat to the independence of Parliament. The disputes and jealousies created by the Civil List developed in the reigns of George I and George II and came to a climax in the reign of George III. The result was an alteration of the constitutional foundation of the Civil List which further weakened the doctrine of the independence of the Crown and which marked an important step in the evolution of parliamentary government
Constitution · Doctrine · Elite · Independence (probability theory · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Separation of powers · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law
Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke's Political Economy
Parliamentarism
The Losing of the Initiative by the House of Commons, 1780–1914
Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation
Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe’s Military Revolution
The Duke of Newcastle and the Financing of the Seven Years’ War
Princely Debt, Public Credit, and Commercial Values in Late Georgian Britain
Ceremony and Politics
Architect-Builders in London and Edinburgh, C. 1750–1800, and the Market for Expertise
Queen Victoria's civil list
Reynolds's Newspaper, Opposition to Monarchy and the Radical Anti-Jubilee
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,19 |
| Citation span | 1968 - 2024 (57) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |