Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The ‘King and Country’ Debate, 1933

Student Politics, Pacifism and the Dictators

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8958741
AutoresMartin Ceadel (University of London, autor de correspondencia)
Año1979
Volumen22
Número2
Páginas397-422
Fecha de publicación1979-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00016885
OpenAlexW1989732366
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas14

On 9 February 1933 the Oxford Union debated and carried by 275 votes to 153 the motion ‘That this House will in no circumstances fight for its King and Country’. After a few days this became a major news story, first in Britain then also in the world press: the British embassies in Madrid and Santiago cabled the Foreign Office in alarm at the appearance of the story in the Spanish and Chilean press. The motion was taken up also by student debating societies all over Britain and overseas: in the United States, for example, any pledge to take no part in war came to be known as the ‘Oxford pledge’ or the ‘Oxford oath’. Since the debate, which took place ten days after Hitler had become chancellor of Germany, appeared to contrast British liberal, pacifist effeteness with fascist martial virility it was seized on in Germany and Italy. The Liberal M.P. Robert Bernays told the house of commons how he had been asked about the debate later in 1933 by a prominent Nazi youth leader: ‘There was an ugly gleam in his eye when he said: “The fact is that you English are soft.”’ And on 7 July 1934 Alfred Zimmern, professor of international relations at Oxford, wrote from Geneva to the former Union president responsible for the debate: ‘I hope you do penance every night and every morning for that ill-starred Resolution. It is still going on sowing dragons’ teeth. If the Germans have to be knocked out a second time it will be partly your fault

Economic history · House of Commons · Nazism · Parliament · Pledge · Political science · Politics · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law

  • The Oxford Union Debate on War in 1933

    Open Access•Taru Haapala•Redescriptions Political Thought…•2017

  • Commemorating the First World War in Britain

    Maggie Andrews•Journal of War and Culture Studies•2018

  • Beyond Brideshead

    Open Access•Ross Brooks•Journal of British Studies•2020

  • Life, DNA and the model

    Open Access•Robert Bud•The British Journal for the…•2013

  • A Citizenship of Distinction in the Open Radio Debates of Kampala

    Open Access•Florence Brisset-Foucault•Africa•2013

  • Essays in Labour History

    Open Access•Asa Briggs, John Saville•Essays in Labour History•1960

  • The Peace Prophets

    Paul I Miller, John K Nelson•Journal of American History•1968

  • Public Opinion and the Last Peace

    Max Beloff•International Affairs•1945

  • Mussolini's Roman Empire

    Muriel Grindrod•International Affairs•1977

  • England in the Twentieth Century

    Open Access•C L Mowat•History•1966

  • The Consequences of the War to Great Britain

    Henry W Macrosty, Francis Wrigley Hirst•The Economic Journal•1935

  • For Peace and Justice; Pacifism in America, 1914-1941

    Open Access•H Silverman, Henry J Silverman et al.•American Quarterly•1972

  • Deux mémoires inédits des frères Massiac sur Buenos Ayres en 1660

    Open Access•Paul Roussier•Journal de la Société des…•1933

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,38
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2020 (8)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae