The Paradox of Peel as Carlylean Hero

Thomas Carlyle's promotion of Sir Robert Peel as a heroic statesman capable of presiding over a strongly interventionist state is paradoxical in light of the latter's rejection of paternalistic government. This paradox is heightened by Carlyle's hostility to the whigs: some members of this party identified an active role for the state and struggled against tendencies in whiggism which were connected to the ‘liberal toryism’ of Peel and his followers. An examination of Carlyle's knowledge of, and attitude towards, Peel shows that he was aware of his attraction to liberal economic ideas. However, Carlyle believed that Peel's sense of moral purpose and his cool view of conventional parliamentarianism were indicative of heroic potentials that were not possessed by whig politicians. The popularity which Peel enjoyed in the late 1840s was attributed by Carlyle to a widespread appreciation of his distinctive qualities; this provided the grounds for a generalized heroism which could be focused in an active state that was freed from the trammels of both economic liberalism and parliamentarianism

Art · Classical liberalism · HERO · Liberalism · Literature · Paternalism · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

• The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought

  Open Access•Gareth Stedman Jones, Gregory Claeys•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  Add to list

• German liberalism in the nineteenth century

  Open Access•Wolfgang J Mommsen•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  Add to list

• Constitutional liberalism in France

  Open Access•Jeremy Jennings•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  Add to list

• Thomas Carlyle and kingship

  Amity Jordan, Alexander Jordan•History of European Ideas•2026

  Add to list