Planning the Urban Future in 1960s Britain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8959052 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guy Ortolano (0000-0001-5802-6922, New York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 477-507 |
| Publication date | 2011-05-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x11000100 |
| OpenAlex | W2168822712 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 13 |
This article recovers Buckinghamshire county council's proposal to build a monorail city for 250,000 residents during the 1960s. The project was eventually taken over by Whitehall, which proceeded to establish Britain's largest new town of Milton Keynes instead, but from 1962 to 1968 local officials pursued their monorail metropolis. By telling the story of ‘North Bucks New City’, the article develops a series of claims. First, the proposal should be understood not as the eccentric creation of a single British county, but rather as one iteration of larger state efforts to manage the densities and distributions of growing populations. Second, while the 1960s witnessed the automobile's decisive triumph as a means of personal mobility in Britain, that very triumph ironically generated critiques of the car and quests for alternatives. Third, the monorail was part of a complex social vision that anticipated – and, in part through the facilitation of recreational shopping, sought to alleviate – a crisis of delinquency expected to result from a world of automation and affluence. Fourth, despite its ‘futuristic’ monorail, the plan ultimately represented an effort by experts and the state to manage social change along congenial lines. Fifth, the proposal advanced a nationalist urbanism, promising renewed global stature for post-imperial Britain by building upon its long urban history. Finally, the article concludes by arguing that this unrealized vision points to the limitations of ‘modernism’ in the history of urban planning, and to the problems of teleology in the history of the 1960s
Archaeology · Civil engineering · Economics · Economy · Monorail · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Recreation · Sociology · State (computer science · Urbanism · Engineering · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US
The Lost World of the British Leisure Centre
‘Nature Does Not Make a Jump’
Genealogy of method in early modern British planning practice 1920–1965
Seeing like a cyclist
Fictions from the underground
Stonehouse
Planning permanent air raid precautions
Urban Societies in Europe since 1945
Emigration, War and Reconstruction
Traffic logic, state strategies and free speech in an urban park
The myth of the “Brasília of the North”
Phoenix Rising
Landscapes of Hope and Crisis
Decolonizing the New Town
Central Government and Town-Centre Redevelopment in Britain, 1959–1966
Gender, Paid Employment, and Deindustrialization in New Towns in North-West England, c. 1970–1990s
Post‐colonial careering and urban policy mobility
Ring Road
A road scheme, the state, and the détournement of urban space
Architecture in the Sixties and the Sixties in architecture
The kinetic icon
Postgraduate Essay Prize Winner for 2005 * A New Look at the Affluent Worker
The Nature of Decision-making in the Post-war New Towns Policy
No Hammock for the Idle
The Future of the South-East
The Formation of the Great Ouse Water Authority
The Englishness of English Architecture
The Younger Generation
The Lost World of Young Conservatism
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,58 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |