Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Liberal versus Liberal

1874. A Surrebuttal

Bibliographic Data

ID8959104
AuthorsMichael Hurst (St. John's College, corresponding author)
Year1976
Volume19
Issue4
Pages1001-1004
Publication date1976-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00010815
OpenAlexW4240063870
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

Let us return to the undying fascination of Bradford and Sheffield. Like Wright before him, Temmel misses the point of my using the Bradford and Sheffield examples. Many schoolteachers often take the line that if the slowest children in their classes understand something the rest can be taken to have mastered it. In a somewhat similar way, I argued that if the Liberal party could be shown to be vastly more catholic than Vincent's definition allowed for in two large places where the structure of society was least favourable to a Right and Centre, then his overall contentions would have been brought most seriously into question. 1874 was a fair date to choose and comprehensive Liberalism was easily to be observed. Examination of the two boroughs showed that British Liberalism was much more broadly-faceted than Vincentian theory allowed; that ‘Whiggery’ was not just a family word, divorced in several respects from a doctrinal context; and that the Centre and the Radicals were in fact varied. If the Centre and Radicals flourished in those places, a fortiori they would elsewhere. The ‘slowest’ so to speak had obliged with data and so the Vincent case fell to the ground. Such an approach makes some intellectual demands upon the reader, not only logical but imaginative and factual. Nevertheless, it should not have proved too much for any able person in any serious profession

Archaeology · Art history · Cartography · Context (archaeology · Fell · Geography · Liberal Party · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Wright · Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · History · Law

  • Current Bibliography of Urban History

    Open Access•Diana Dixon, Anthony Sutcliffe•Urban History•1981

  • IV. Liberal versus Liberal

    Open Access•Michael Hurst•The Historical Journal•1972

  • Liberal Versus Liberal, 1874

    Open Access•Michael Hurst•The Historical Journal•1974

  • Liberal Versus Liberal, 1874

    Open Access•Matthew R Temmel•The Historical Journal•1975

  • Liberal versus Liberal, 1874

    Open Access•D G Wright•The Historical Journal•1973

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,02
Citation span1981 - 1981 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae