Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutions old and new

Henrion de Pansey before and after the French revolution

Bibliographic Data

ID8959121
AuthorsJ H M Salmon (Bryn Mawr College, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume38
Issue4
Pages907-931
Publication date1995-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00020501
OpenAlexW2165511599
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited19

Henrion de Pansey (1742–1829) is an important but neglected constitutional historian whose views on the French past served as a commentary on the unwritten and written constitutions of his own age. A feudal lawyer before the revolution and an appeal judge under Napoleon and the restored Bourbons, he published a variety of works combining liberal sentiment with judicial traditionalism. His career illustrates the shift of moderate conservative opinion across the revolutionary divide. The alteration in his political thought is best understood through its conjunction with the three historical modes prevalent in his time: a discontinuous approach, accepting the past as a series of different regimes interrupted by revolutions; a developmental view, charting the progressive growth of institutions from seeds planted in antiquity; and a fundamentalist habit of thought that saw change as decline from pristine perfection. The jurists of sixteenth-century France remained Henrion's most admired models, and he used his roseate vision of the early modern French monarchy as a sometimes critical commentary on the constitutions designed in his own day. In prerevolutionary days he recast the ideas of the sixteenth-century rationalizer of feudalism, Charles Dumoulin, into Enlightenment terms. After the revolution , De l'Autoritéjudiciaire ( 1810 ) depicted the moderating role of the judiciary as defenders of past constitutions, and formed an oblique commentary on Napoleon's civil code . Des Pairs et de l'ancienne constitution ( 1816 ) appraised the charter of 1814. It accepted a measure of popular participation in government, but held judicial expertise essential in legislation . Des Assemblées nationales ( 1826 ) shifted the emphasis from judicial oversight to the separation of powers and representative government, although Henrion, like Guizot and the doctrinaires, remained critical of popular democracy

Appeal · Charter · Constitution · Democracy · Enlightenment · Feudalism · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Theology · European Political History Analysis · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

  • The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought

    Open Access•Gareth Stedman Jones, Gregory Claeys•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  • Scepticism, priestcraft, and toleration

    Open Access•Richard H Popkin, Mark Goldie•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • German liberalism in the nineteenth century

    Open Access•Wolfgang J Mommsen•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  • Constitutional liberalism in France

    Open Access•Jeremy Jennings•Cambridge History of 19th Century…•2011

  • Cameralism and the sciences of the state

    Open Access•Keith Tribe•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • Political languages of the French Revolution

    Open Access•Keith Michael Baker•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • Encyclopedias and the diffusion of knowledge

    Open Access•Daniel Roche•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought

    Open Access•Mark Goldie, Robert Wokler•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • Social contract theory and its critics

    Open Access•Patrick Riley•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • The comparative study of regimes and societies

    Open Access•Melvin Richter•The Cambridge history of…•2006

  • Citizens

    Simon Schama•Citizens•1992

  • The Attack on `Feudalism' in Eighteenth-Century France

    Orville T Murphy, J Q C MACKRELL et al.•The American Historical Review•1975

  • Historians and the Law in Postrevolutionary France

    William R Keylor, Donald R Kelley•The American Historical Review•1985

  • Lettres sur l’histoire de France (1820-1827)

    Open Access•Augustin Thierry•Philosophie des sciences…•1988

  • The Parisian Order of Barristers and the French Revolution

    Bailey Stone, Michael P Fitzsimmons•The American Historical Review•1988

  • The Parisian Order of Barristers and the French Revolution

    John C Simmonds, Michael P Fitzsimmons•The History Teacher•1988

  • The Constitutions and Other Select Documents illustrative of the History of France, 1789-1907

    Frank Maloy Anderson•The American Historical Review•1909

  • The Constitutions and Other Select Documents Illustrative of the History of France, 1789-1901

    Henry E Bourne, Frank Maloy Anderson•The American Historical Review•1905

  • The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law

    Open Access•J G A Pocock•Ancient Constitution and the…•1987

  • Parlement , Politics and the Parti Janséniste

    Julian Swann•French History•1992

  • Historians and the Law

    William K Klingaman•The Public Historian•1981

  • Michel de L'Hospital and the Traite de la Reformation de la Justice

    Sylvia Neely•French Historical Studies•1986

  • The Decline of the French Jurists as Political Theorists, 1660-1789

    William F Church•French Historical Studies•1967

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2006 - 2011 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae